This means that Bias™ is only activated when we request an unscheduled enhancement.
1 Like
Well we discovered today the requirements needed for armor.
Numbers, or indication of the numbers are needed.
I cannot say if the PSO reports had such requirements as the new report on Abrams by Wareta as I haven’t looked at them in some time, but if the PSO’s report didn’t that’d seem to be the first reason they were rejected.
Gajin have its moments. I expect them, for the time being to have some form of talk what the f- to do with these americans. This is number one thread and talking point over the few last days, hell, even many russian mains are supporting this! Lets hope for change of mind. Hopium is all we have left at this moment
6 Likes
Classic Gaijin
1 Like
We hope that the winds of freedom will blow in this game that Stalin has in mind. Balance in this game!
1 Like
A source is attached to the report:
Which means something was used to back up the video, which would make perfectly sense, i don’t understand your point.
1 Like
I don’t know, I haven’t seen it for a long time,If the report is correct, that means the trickster played along.
1 Like
The only source we see is a Youtube clip of a different tank than the one the report is filed for.
1 Like
All im telling you that the bug report have a source attached to it, you can’t see it because they are hidden for everyone except technical moderators and the user that created the bug report, you can’t say that the YouTube video was the only thing used for the bug report because you don’t have access to the sources submitted.
4 Likes
Fair, but the only visible source is one of a different model of tank. No pushback whatsoever.
We can see plenty of pushback in recent reports.
1 Like
I understand your point, only the user and tech mods know what’s attached on the sources though.
1 Like
@Gunjob sorry to ping you and i know you don’t handle these but can you ask for your team to forward a dedicated official responder for this thread ?
this is getting out of hand
8 Likes
He literally says in the post that the attached item is a screenshot from the link.
It’s the weekend.
They don’t really do much on the weekends, and as annoyed as I am with the Devs and very acute sections of the mod team, I don’t begrudge them taking it easy on the weekend.
1 Like
And how can you tell its the only thing added? If you want to say something about the report, you can say its very poorly written, thats about it.
1 Like
- No more information was asked for.
- It is the only information we have to go on so it is what we can go on.
I think you have no idea how the bug-report platform works.
Also, if you do not have access to every source used for the bug-report, why you should blame the devs?
Also, just for added context, two bug reports similarly approved
1 Like
I think you have no idea on how factual information works. Until we can get proof that other documentation is provided all we can say is it was approved based on the video. Hell the Challenger had it’s rack armor add just off of a video alone and the poster even said it was the video alone.
See my edited message.
I quote " i attached a screenshot of an official commercial video of the T-90MS export version, and the link of the video."
anything else is speculation.