Well now it applies to the live server as the Sep was added with 0 changes from the dev server.
they’d better write that special Abrams devblog fast
6 Likes
heh hope stupid Russian mains have a wet dream by now none of western tanks get fix
Chally3 leo2A7V SepV2 all get sht on
1 Like
but hey abrams is as it was or worse now ?XD
well can’t wait to see russia vs russia in mm because no one bothers to play usa germany uk etc
and you see those bots struggleling to hit drivers hatch lol
Dam U right
1 Like
And the F15 sucks lmao, Sparrows are dog water.
as long as western players continue playing and supplying gaijin money nothings gonna change. Review bombing and not giving them a dime is the only way at this point. We should boycott top tier in its entirety and just not play until they get their act together.
7 Likes
Br 6.7 and under is the best part of this game tbh. This top teir BS has shown how awful Gaijin Entertainment it, all of their games are held back by them.
Not US just anything that not Russia
He means that it’s currently under the "Dev server “Air Superiority” category, so this discussion will be archived once they remove the category. So yeah, don’t want that to happen…
@Imaflyingturkey could you move the discussion to another category to prevent it from getting archived? Under Machinery of War or something. Idk if you can move it yourself, otherwise we need to ping a forum mod for it.
Time to grind Russia with Russia Vs Russia matches bois! :D
uh i can try
there its done
Had a bit of a burr up my rear and the documents handy, so I raised a bug report on the bustle side armor over the ammunition rack…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/b4ogshUDi1jN
Was getting pretty tired of being ammo racked by autocannons and oblique main gun shots
Why are you all still talking in a forum. Get down to working on bug report and source material!
Thank you, I’ll extend my thanks to him as well. I was astonished to find how much information was out there, I came across the amended form and the prior one and I had zero idea what it meant. The analysis on it was surprising
1 Like
You are only really here to derail this thread.
And no, they already have a bug report that the devs are looking through, hell they even promised a seperate devblog talking about the issue. Making even more bug reports is only counterproductive until they have addressed the current one.
Not really. I would like to see the result. Abrams feels outdated. Also im curious what will be the outcome 525mm protection?
540mm
But then leoperd is better 😧