It’s almost for sure going to be 9.7 unless they give it the proxy/air burst ammo that I have seen mentioned by people.
Where do people get these 10.3-10.7 BRs from?
Even the Japanese ICV and RCV have airburst ammo and sit at 9.7.
1 Like
“The Stryker is a family of eight-wheeled armored fighting vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III, which in turn derived from the Swiss Mowag Piranha. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) for the United States Army in a plant in London, Ontario.”
HOLD UP, I didn’t knew we build them!!!
I want it to the UK tree too now
You guys cried to get the skink while your nation never used it!
So we use the same excuse “it’s a LAV”
why do you even want a shitty stryker with a bushfarter
2 Likes
Oh nice, I hadn’t looked at them for a while and only knew the basics (crewless turret, sizable wheeled chassis, 30mm bushmaster).
In that case the dragoon is almost guaranteed 9.7 no matter what.
I have a vengeance to accomplish about the skink
1 Like
And when they finally get it the first next thing will be “wth Gaijin why is this thing so ass” as they go heavily negative in it both in winrate and K/D.
fair enough hahaha
The Dragoon should get it since they U.S uses the round.
2 Likes
TBF, i did not want the skink either
- this would be more unique
1 Like
Wonder if this thing will have to face the BMPT :3
Since I am Canadian I wanted to see the skink but I knew it would have issues. The armored roof though is nice cant be 50cal to death.
Cannon worse than Puma’s one, lower firerate, less ammo, lesser distance and accuracy. And guess what, even if Gaijin sets it on 10.3 it still will suffer of BMPTs, question is how this should penetrate sides of BMPTs. Only hope to be on 10.0 BR , higher will become food of permanent downtier, I even doubt Dragoon would win face to face BMD4M
isn’t it just a 30mm bushmaster that is also present in few other vehicles? It would perform similar to them and probably placed at similar BR to them. From what i have heard 30mm bushmaster is not good. Can 30 mm bushmaster not pen BMPT from Side?
BMD-4M would most likely win due to high fire rate and ATGM
Dragoon has better mobility , as we all know what has better mobility goes 0.3-0.7 BR higher. I wouldn’t be mind Dragoon as 9.3 to expand set-up of 9.3 but this is too sweet to be true.
9.7? What the point if there is no proper line-up. Bradley 9.7, okay, Dragoon 9.7 okay, 2 light vehicles without MBT + 9.7 is not popular BR as the result playing 10.3 with Striker.
10.0? As addition to 120S but same issue, will always play 10.7-10.3 and often downtier to 11.3.
I think the irony in this is at the time the U.S needed spaa to fill the gaps so it kind of made sense, but the only reason you want a vehicle to get back at a player base who isnt at fault. You should take it up with the devs not the players, on the flip side the UK has some of the most wheeled light tanks in game, while the US on the other hand has oh hold on wait… ONE wheeled light tank.
1 Like
its the same thing lmao mine just has a rops rollcage and a .50 lol
I agree with you, 9.7 won’t be a good BR for it as the only mbt at 9.7 is merkava 2b and an average player won’t have it, and anything higher would cause it to struggle alot. Better mobility would indeed make it go to higher br. Sadly it would most likely be at 9.7 due to a similar vehicle with good mobility and 30mm bushmaster is present at 9.7 :(
We don’t count event vehicles because nobody sober would pay for non-op event vehicles, even IFV or hot that called the lastest USA’s “gift” lost from battles. Puma stays 10.3 , slightly similar, so probably 10.0-9.7