100%
1 Like
I know it’s not the place but I couldn’t resist the T85E1 glaze. It’s already a suggestion. Show some love for us spaa! 🙏🏽
1 Like
Did anyone else notice M1296 missing spall liner in the Dev stream?
This aged well
Hahahahahaha 9.7 what a joke, while btr82at sits at 9.0 with kornets
1 Like
My guy, most similar vehicles are at 9.7.
What were you smoking that made you think it was ever going to be a different BR?
What are you smoking to think these should be at 9.7? Especially while btr sits at 9.0 with kornets
Hmmm all these very similar vehicles are all 9.7, I sure wonder where the M1296 should end up.
82mm apds monster…
Cmon now apfsds is always 9.7 for some reason.
This is also not completely true. The Badger is 9.0 (for good reasons) with the same APFSDS, the CV9030FIN, CM34 and EFV are 9.3 with the exact same cannon.
There are reasons why the M1296 and similar vehicles are 9.7, but apfsds is not the main one.
1 Like
Canada doesn’t use the Stryker, we have a unarmed variant of the LAV IV that fills the same role though
all of them are much faster and the japanese ones have he vt…
Type 25 has a crewed turret, that already makes it worse than the M1296 whether it has HE-TF or not.
LAV25 would have much better mobility
1 Like
Gajin just liked seeing the bradley unplayable at 9.7 SO MUCH, that they decided to add yet another unplayable 9.7
Similar 30mm bushmasters are at 9.7, but they should be either a lower br or fix the 30mm bushmasters accuracy
Especially the crewless turret ones are more fun than the stats make them appear imo. But yeah better accuracy would be a massive qol buff for these vehicles.
I’ve been enjoying the VBCI-2, so I’m sure the Dragoon will be pretty fun too.
1 Like
Accuracy buff won’t fix the fact that a bushmaster’s APFSDS struggles to pen most MBT’s side plates at that BR.
Imo, EFV should be 8.3 and the Dragoon 8.7. These current BRs are ridiculous.
1 Like
based bushmaxxer