Bye bye M10 Booker
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
X-32 went down?
Rip m10 2 electric boogaloo, you were uninpressive as hell
Well, now it can be added even sooner now that it’s just a prototype. ;)
True
But less likley to be TT 😭 (unless we’re lucky with some HSTV-L magic)
There are more prototypes in tech trees than elsewhere.
Yes but less production vehicles in the American tree end up in the side section. It’s more likely to end up there now, and probably follow the failed light tank trend now and end up there with the AGS, XM8, and CCVL. Hopefully it ends up being TT, but there’s a greater chance now that it won’t be if you ask me.
T1E1 x2, M6A1, 120S, HSTVL, M4/26, T25, XM800, XM803, MBT-70, XM975, T95E1, XM246, M247, T95, T32, T32E1, T92, T77E1… to name a few off the top of my head.
Few of those mentioned are light tanks, and the ratio of non TT ones is greater, that’s my whole point really. Just looking at the precident it means it’s more likely to end up there, but there’s still absolutely a chance yes.
I just posted the precedent…
It’s not like the M10 Booker would have added anything to the US tree if it were added to WT. So it’s fine to come as some random event or premium vehicle.
its basically a more armored stryker that is slower it would sell better than the meteor tho
Yeah in game it would likely be too big and slow to be good as a light tank but also too lightly armored to do anything else.
it definitely going to have the same play style as CV90120, but more armored, definitely resist certain auto cannon round and BR around 11.3 like the AGS
I disagree. The CV90120 has actual mobility which is a big reason why it can do what it does. The M10 has mediocre mobility for a light tank where even a lot of MBTs will beat it.
Anything above 11.0 makes it dead on arrival imo. The VT-5 is already a better LT at 11.0
Yes it would… Why lie?
There is no light tank for USA above BR 8.0. It’s only IFVs and auto-lights.
VT5 has a worse round, and worse gun depression.
@Master_Noodle
No it isn’t. The M10 Booker is not a wheeled vehicle.
It’s far more mobile than the Stryker because it’s a light tank.
Literally the mobility of a Leopard 1 which only maybe the Vextra barely matches due to acceleration and turn circle.
There has been nothing but USA hatred this week.
It’s HP/ton is comparable to the T-90A, which is widely considered one of the least mobile MBTs at 11.0-11.3
Mobility is about acceleration in reverse AND forward, as well as traverse rate.
T-90A is not that mobile because of its reverse speed and traverse rate.
All wheeled vehicles lack mobility compared to equally fast or slightly slower tracked vehicles due to having no traverse rate.