yeah cause you can spawn more than 4 strv122s or leopard 2s lol
No.
It’s much easier, reasonable, achievable and acceptable by simply remove the “magic” of T-80s, which means:
ERA no longer eat shells even shot from 90°;
Lower the autoloader to the historical-accuracy level;
Fuel tank no longer eat up whole shell while not even do any damage to crew;
Adjust ammo detonation possibility same as NATO vehicles like Abrams and Challenger.
Abrams has most of the ammo in the blowout pannel
So what ammo are you reffering to as the T-80s ammo doesnt sit in that
Everybody jumping on the bandwagon of bias. They all know what’s up with T-80BVM.
By the way talking about the advantages of Ka-52 and 50, they are highly resistant compared to other.
I’m currently playing the VAB mistral (in top tier battle) and I need between 2 or 3 missile hits in order to take down these heli. Note that it doesn’t happens for other nation and the same happens for the Su25 series
right right
At this point you should just stop talking
Hey! Thanks for linking my work haha
I’m glad I can set a good example for why CR2 needs some serious work. I’ve also got a post on TES that outlines the massive glaring issues that tank faces as well :9
Yeah, it was great work. Im think about creating a master discussion thread for it that links off too all the problems both other threads and bug reprorts and try and get it fixed
Every bit helps, man! I’d say do it. The CR2 deserves so much better
Nah, I’ll keep talking since I’ve been playing ground since closed beta.
Blowout panel is blowout panel, it’s fine and it works. But the T-80s don’t get anything similar and it detonates much harder, that’s the problem.
well they got something similar
the great russian space programm throwing turrets high in the air
Ariete, Leopard 2, Type 10, Merkava all have the same cook off rate as T-80’s ammo as well.
Even tanks don’t want to stay on that soil.
that turret is not fully loaded with ammo, and in this game the turret rotation speed is even faster.