Liam=p engine power is unrealistic. it needs a nerf and in no would should be able to catch up to a f104

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
,
1

is this a joke or did yall make a engine bug

2

Who is Liam P?

12 Likes
3

if it isnt our world foremost expert on vehicle balancing

9 Likes
4

wanabe mig15 with afterburner

5

sounds like liam P needs to hit the gym

6 Likes
6

You should try retracting your air brake on the F-104

7 Likes
7

Lim-5 is just the superior Mig

1 Like
8

MiG-17PF*

9

This legit might be a second Tiger Tank account lol

11 Likes
10

Give it a year or two and there will be the Tiger Tank AI chat bot.

5 Likes
11

Now I understand why Megatron always wants to kill him.

6 Likes
12

tiger tank 2 this time

2 Likes
13

bud who even uses the airbreak on the pencil

14

You, since you say the Lim 5P catches up to the Starfighter

3 Likes
15

oddly enough it was only thing that did. not even a mig19 could catch me

16

Polish bias at its finest

4 Likes
17

Nah, Tiger Tank makes well formed Devil’s Advocate arguments.
This isn’t a Devil’s Advocate argument, let alone well formed.

1 Like
18

I can’t disagree—@TIGER_TANK_1 have well put and constructed posts (although I don’t agree with his points for the most part), the problem that people seems it that people are mixing terrible posts, like this one, what’s a Liam=p (I know that’s a wrong spelling of an airplane) in first place? With controversial or topics that great majority doesn’t agree on. War Thunder Forums is a place to discuss and I’m still to understand this mean to compare actually bad post with controversial discussions, in this case using they as lolcow as measuring of bad posts.

This is a good post:

This is not a good post:

What’s a bad post in my opinion? Duplicated threads with bland content that doesn’t contribute nor bring meaningful discussion (although this is subjective, for the most part not related to War Thunder or without post-reading basis to sustain a healthy discussion) like this one. TIGER_TANK_1’s proposal to have the BMPT-72 battle rating is well constructed though I would’ve have added more things, still have a basis to sustain itself, it’s controversial, and people will relate it with the person (which I don’t think it’s fair) and relate with content that the community dislike.

2 Likes
19

The difference between Tiger_Tank_I and this guy is, Tiger_Tank_I has horrible takes but presents them well, this guy has horrible takes and presents them poorly.

4 Likes
20

Post can be well put and completly insane in the thought it covers and reasonibg for it, these are not mutually exclusive.

Tiger might take care formulating the post, but the suggestion it covers is usually controversional at best, and reasoning for it is more often than not nonsensical.

See most of his posts about aircrafts, which he considers solely through optic of “can they napalm bomb?”

3 Likes