A low quality pic of the missile in launch tubes
1 Like
Yep, ur pdf files on the drive need to be translated into commonspeak now and we’re good to go
EDIT:
pretty much done although i cant find specific thrust values
1 Like
Here is the MBDA representation of how it would get mounted.
seeing this
it tells me it was already had reached that stage that it was designed to be tube launched from the tiger UHT
1 Like
@Stona_WT can we expect buff for the poor UHT which doesnt have a turret nor any good self defense?
the chinese have the TY-90, the americans and british have Aim-9 and starstreak and french have mistral…
UHT doesnt deserve 12.0 at the state it is in…
2 Likes
At least fix these bugs, some of which have been waiting for a fix for literal years… half of which would take a programmer 20 seconds to fix.
- Option to take 144 countermeasures
- Incorrect ARL-400 Band Coverage
- Lack of dual flight controls
- PARS 3 LR incorrect missile behaviour
- PARS 3 LR missing proximity fuse
- PARS 3 LR incorrect lateral acceleration
- PARS 3 LR incorrect weight
- PARS 3 LR incorrect maximum range
- Incorrect rockets for the FZ225 rocket launchers
- FZ225 rocket launchers for the outer pylons
- TDA 68mm rocket launchers
- Tiger UHT missing rockets on outer pylons
- Tiger UHT using incorrect rocket type
- PARS 3 LR twin launcher for the outer pylons
- NC621 20mm cannon pods
- Mistral ATAM for the outer pylons
6 Likes
Another one…
The landing gear does not retract even though irl it does
Nah, it definitely doesn’t ^^
More interested in the ozelot mounting tbh. Anyone got info on that? Was it built?
3 Likes
I’m for it if it was actually fitted to vehicles.
No that remained just a proposal. Although the ozelot (current one) could fire the LFK like a stinger i doubt that is emough evidence for a new vehicle or a modification.
sigh…
(on the topic for PGM-500/2000)
so if this is enough proof for the brits and the italians, why is this (LFK-NG)
not enough for the UHT?
3 Likes
They will probably say no because it wasn’t mounted on a Tiger
There is a “reasonable connection” lol
1 Like
Yeah, but that was only because it was actually mounted on a Tornado in the first place.
I mean… for balance right? 😅
i found a higher quality pic finally!!
4 Likes
Beautiful
1 Like
That is not the same from what I understood. Indeed the devs said that it’s fine to add a weapon showcased alongside an aircraft if the same aircraft from another country is integrated with such weapon (that was the hypotetical case for the Italian tornado). This aint the case tought.
fair, but it was practically integrated already what with all the trials and the new info we found about the launchers
this is the launcher which was going to be used on the UHT
(Albeit upside down)