That’s already been reported and forwarded months ago. This serves only as a further confirmation.
2 Likes
Both sides have that, and it forces people to play the center more, which is more safe than you think from those positions.
without the part on the right the middle definitely has become more safe, that was the whole problem with the middle, getting sniped from the hill
but its not really a good solution imo, since, like @ARK_BOI marked, one sniper spot is still there, the other one is not as good as that one
1 Like
i believe they should remodel the maps more then just cutting some parts of it and we saw that theyre capable of doing it, they did it a few times on some maps but not enough for my taste
This new Sim map for RB is great fun to play. Tunesia. You can use all your precious toys for max effect. Choppers, aircraft, MBTs how they meant to be played. Ambushers , ATGM carriers. Even close range areas exist around the caps. They should do more like this for top tier, except dumbing down everything with offmap timers. Most maps became so small and full of obstacles, trees, buidling, rocks, you have no line of sight…you hit the opposite map edge in 1 minute. You can’t really use choppers, cause you see nothing except these obstacles.
8 Likes
I haven’t gotten it yet but I thumbed it up.
fun for spaded tanks, stock tanks over here suffering and $hit. they are D.O.N.E F***ed
Its always like this.
yeah this map really surprised me when i first played it but so far i like it
Gaijin when STANAG protection levels
lets not talk about STANAG
shudders at ASPRO-HMT on the Chally 2 TES
1 Like
resistant to 30mm APDS
“Ivan, this mean 30mm KE effectiveness yes?”
“Da, it do mean that Dimitry”
5 Likes
Who love Swedish tree?
3 Likes
That version of the map was in ages ago, i remember having it a few times like half a decade ago, was absolute pain though as you were playing it in like king tigers XD
Why are we using US CIA Reference documents to nerf a German tank ?? I thought Gaijin stated for the M1 they can’t use russian doc’s to change the vehicle because the source has other flaws … Community Bug Reporting System
Not to mention it has flaws
Community Bug Reporting System
5 Likes
The source is from 1984, the 2A4 started production in 1985.
Not that Gaijin cares
7 Likes
2A4 main changes were to FCS, gun and its placement wasnt changed anyhow, so 2A4s elevation should be same as earlier ones for sure.
I know.
Still, 40/40 is correct for both 2A4 and 2A5 etc. and was proven to be in a previous report.
2A5 has electrical turret traverse, 2A4 doesnt.