Tbh fix PSO and 2A7V armor is enough to make me happy at least for a while now as for planes well kinda hopeless but with AMRAAM use it as air spawn kill in GRB is probably still can make it work for CAS well GBU drop speed limit should be gone like gone for good because Tornado already can’t dodge pantsir without it speed (and Tornado need it a lot for deal with pantsir)
F-15C would retain the highest TWR.
IRST isn’t “the bees knees”, and its RCS drop won’t be as significant as people think.
No… not at all.
As for Leopard 2A4M CAN and 2PL, both are perfect with their DM43 and KE-W rounds.
They don’t need DM53.
Not AMAP-B, B-tech. As in the armor inserts for the base armor from the leo 2A4 from the 1980’s.
ah, shouldnt it be C tech at least?
Idk, a lot of people here seem to assume its B-tech, ive heard because the original 2A4 NL were B-tech, or atleast believed to be b-tech, but i see no reason why with such comprehensive upgrades to the tanks that it should be assumed they remained b-tech.
it depends. Using the empty weights and thrust values from wikipedia (I’m lazy, ok) as well as adding 4x AIM-120 + 4x AIM-9, 50% fuel and the average male as pilot, with AB the F-15C performs slightly better (by 0.37%). Without AB the EFT has more TWR (8% more)
With heavier loadouts, the F-15 would get relatively better, but it always performs worse without AB
F-15C produces ~27,000lbf of thrust at sea level going 0.9 mach, per engine.
Typhoon produces 20,000lbf of thrust at sea level going 0.9 mach, per engine.
So despite the F-15C weighing 1.7 tons more, its TWR remains higher.
The wikipedia thrust of F-15C is static, whereas the wikipedia thrust of Typhoon is at mach 0.9 [I confirmed this by finding a document I won’t share due to not wanting to be a War Thunder forum statistic].
The hulls are pre-5th batch, as the return roller configuration shows. It is certainly possible that Canada upgraded the internal composites but this would have likely been more costly than buying add-on armour that also provides KE protection, like AMAP.
The 2A4s were procured specifically for COIN operations. Also, taking the canadian military’s funding into account, it seems unlikely that the internal composites were upgraded.
2 Likes
In the long run, can we get Poland as an air and ground branch for Germany? Or get the Argentine F16AM as a solution to the pressing need？
how it is? we already have the 2a7v which is nearly the same vehicle…
2A7HU has worse Hull amor than the 2A7V at the moment for no reason
Right now it’s just data from the test server, it’s not completely ready yet
I’m baffled at the fact they couldnt Even copy paste the 2A7V DM onto the 2A7HU, and somehow managed worse Hull protection than a type 10
gaijin even made the wrong top armor model, it should be composite armor, but now it is structural steel, without more staff, this version and the new progress will be slower and worse than before
HOW THE HELL did they do to make it STRUCTURAL STEEL?!?!?!
???
The only advantages the F4F has 2 more Aim 9J, more flares and higher top speed. Meanwhile the F5E has better maneuverability, better energy retention, better DM, better FM, and has colder engines.
The F5E has been regarded by many as the best and most OP 10.7br jet in the game.
The F4F late is a decent 10.7br jet, but it is not even close to the best one
Well, we already have polish plane in german tree
Yes, for now Poland and Argentina are legitimate branches of Germany
Britain and the US also already have polish vehicles though, so 1 polish plane that was used in east german service doesn’t say a lot.
2 Likes
What polish made vehicle does US and Britain has?