Let us have map bans for Nuclear Escalation

I’ve noticed in NE the longer range Fox-3s start to have more of an advantage then in regular ARB, you take off on the Russian side and you instantly have a wall of C3/D1s incoming from planes sitting at 10km alt and mach 2.5. The larger maps and the air defense buffer giving them time to gain alt and speed really seems to tip the balance.

1 Like

f-15??

No it doesnt. They are very equally matched. VERY evenly. And that’s a problem, because the MiG-21 cant do CAS at all

Them and EFTs, I known the regular F-15s are a little slower, but even those can still easily get mach 1.8 launches.

1 Like

seriously-laugh

I don’t play that, so I don’t really know why that would be a consideration.
While a single map might need some adjusting, I don’t think “map bans”
are the answer, or even likely to happen. Gaijin gave us the little option
more as a token gesture(we hear you) than as an actual solution to the
player’s complaints. They have held firm in not giving the players more ban
options ever since then, so . . . I do not see what you are asking for happening.

dntknw

how about instead the game lets me ban all winter maps

1 Like

*>Lives under a rock

What? 😂😂😂

1 Like

70fxez
You’re a real one

id love to be be able to ban specific scenarios in ground battles. Only having one ban means that i have to still play games on maps i really hate just because i hate aral sea the most

Yes, absolutely. You have no chance to calmly attack ground troops because there are enemy aircraft in the air all the time, and they shoot you down. Even on the large map, it was bad on 14.7. We need bigger maps; the bigger, the better. But the airfields mustn’t be too far from the front line.

1 Like