Leopards w/ spall liners are way too op

Russian biased german(o)phobe, lol. Cope, OP.

now let them learn if they can’t it skill issue

1 Like

T-90M was added just this update. Soviet players have been spalling just as much as everyone else until T-90M.

2 Likes

This is deceptively true. Like yes they generate basically the same amount of shrapnel as everyone else. However there is the aspect of fuel tanks, and non-spalling internal plating that do favor certain internal component layout. Which leads to perceived less spalling because quite often there is only the dart left over after going through those modules.

Probably here were T-90M is shafted as iirc that has the 20mm hardened plate on the front aspect of the carousel which doesn’t get spall liner. Meaning most lower plate shots should kill. (Spall liner didn’t change anything here because you allready relied on that plate for consistant lower plate kills on T-72B+/T-90 vehicles

It’s missing about 150-200mm KE and some CE as well on the UFP yea.
The weight is correct now though.

1 Like

Now russian players will know what means “aim for weakspots” XD

5 Likes

They always knew how to.

2 Likes

Good joke

Fighting Leopards is unbearable now, my chally 2 are NO match. Brother I am losing my sanity

2 Likes

Repeat after me Strv122 , the german leopards dont have the armor or the spall liner on the chassis. There is a big difference

3 Likes

its still a pain if your in a chally 2 or 3

1 Like

fair, but still it makes it sounds like germany is the OP unfair nation, when it mainly is Strv122.
The only good Leo is the 2A7V, which is missing half its armor.
In the mean time all Strv122 have more armor and spall liners on turret and chassis.

2 Likes

The problem you guys are going to have is that yeah it armor isn’t as good as swedens but everyone else is suffering worse -russia
Alot of people are gonna rag on you guys which is unfortunate

Not only 1 tank, If I’m not wrong mate, it’s more than that:

US: M3A3 Bradley;
GER: Leopard 2A5/2A6/2A7V;
USSR: T-90M;
UK: Challenger 2/2 (2F)/2 TES/BN/2E/2 OES/3 TD;
SW: Strv 122/122B PLSS/122B+, Strf 9040C, Lvkv 9040C;

I may be wrong for exactly which tanks have this feature.

Jup sadly, even more so another factor is that sweden has light tanks with spall liners as well. Everyones calls out germany sadly for whatever reason. When Strv122 are the problem. Yes the Strv122 is a Leopard variant but they arent made equal and the swedish line up is still just way stronger.
I just which people would specify it more

1 Like

seems like it is more of a general duck up of gajin as well

poor souls need buff real bad i know too well how bad challenger are but there is nothing we can do because well Challenger are not the good tank at the begin with maybe get Canadian Leopard 2A6 might help also SepV2 are not even worth getting

well deserve for suffering if in case for Russia

Yes, you are right about the Strv 122, but in this case, the OP mentions that the 2A5/2A6/2A7 is stronger because it’s more numerous than Strv 122. At least, with this point, makes it looks like more powerful but in reality, apparently, it’s not all that.

Only at the front and the turret unless its the 3TD then just the front

1 Like