No it wasent ok. Thats my entire point, We also brought it to the forums. It was complained about for months until finally it was all nerfed and balanced. Top tier was pretty balanced right before the update. but now its all messed up again. Probably will take another couple months till they figure it out again.
IIRC Leopards 2 gets them in game since 2A5.
Regarding spall liners, they should be just removed with getting damage back.
I would be ok if they turned down HP of Spall liner as its now a module with HP, and made damage bigger as it was.
Or disabled until every single vehicle who had it gets it with everyone.
isnt the 2a7 missing it’s D tech Armor? and also it’s said to be overweight than it should be. The Leo missing it’s DM73 is kinda fine i guess? it’s current top round is good enough if not the Best Ingame currently. i dont really find them terrifying in the Type 10 which is already full of holes and no 30-42 deg/ of turret traverse
1 Like
Spall liners irl 2a5, 2a6 have only in roof. 2a7v full. Questions?
Hahahahahaha!! I knew that Russian mains wouldn’t like it and i was right now know how other people feel when need to aim weak spot and no spall now it’s just a week but those Russians do it for years. And that unfinish 2A7V in term of armor btw
5 Likes
And not supposed to be fixed. Like puma for years
ive started to see this trend…
one guy makes a literal dogsh*t post and leaves.
and due to its controversial nature, people start arguing about it where in reality its nothing wrong.
im starting to suspect someones just trolling
2 Likes
Well that only raises questions to me why it was put there if its not even effective in any way IRL (talking of one certain case).
Thanks for clarification though.
In game 2a5, 2a6 have same as irl
I understood that part.
So spall liners don’t need in game ( i think) all users because it’s just bad mechanic in game, that deal many questions in damage
I will agree on that but if its done any better I am ok with it.
RN its another getaway card for area which is literally most rich in them.
the Leopard 2a7 currently seems to be just the same as Leopard 2a6 except for the Spall liner on the side hull and gen 3 thermals. and it’s overweight by like 5-6 tons? what’s up with that?
1 Like
It suppose to have better armor D-tech that why it heavier
1 Like
"supposed " to, is the important part. For gajin it somehow has weaker armor then the Strv122B+ that weighs less with the side nera armor add ons.
That has to be one damn heavy gun L/55A1, and we totaly dont know how much it weighs in reality /s
2 Likes
and yet gaijin didnt give it it’s D tech? man gaijin really needs to step up. or atleast put it’s weight to same as 2a6 since it’s just the same tank currently .and they refuse to give it it’s actual armor
come to think of it i think the TKX P also has the same issue? it’s same weight as type 10
Shouldn’t be that heavy for the gun I’m sure it because of it armor that need to be correct
sorry forgot the /s xD
just finished a few match in t90m fighting a few leopard 2/strv 122 and yeah, nah, they are not op, it probably, most likely, just soviet main not used to aim for weakspot
9 Likes
indeed. these russian mains are so used to Push W and Win and no aim Strat. now they get what they deserved.
8 Likes