Leopard2 "nato" frontal hull armor

[G3ntl3man95]

so my opinion leopard 2 hull armor underperform…

so have 35 and 45 normal armor wich in this angle = 120mm protection which means the 520 mm composite nera armor have only 180 mm protection vs apfsds

but russian nera have 200mm protection vs apfsds bettar than leopard 520mm nera hull

[CofCof]

You need evidence to back up what you’re saying, not to mention that you’re comparing a 10.7 hull with an 11.3 one

[Terminated_800]

armour? cries in abrams

[G3ntl3man95]

man i compared a mbt hull with a fk nera element!!! 520 mm nato composite witn nera weaker tnak a russian nera kit…

[CofCof]

The Russian vehicle is, first and foremost, an ERA kit, and is not better than that amor of the Leopard 2A4

[G3ntl3man95]

for u tehere is 12.3 vehicle

[CofCof]

With a hull of 10.7 , it is the Leopard 2A4 chassis

[G3ntl3man95]

man u come with i compared 10.7 vehicle with 11.3 nov is 12.3 vs 11.3

[G3ntl3man95]

and abrams not nato tank?

[CofCof]

But one is 11.3 for survivability and the other is 12.3 for firepower and mobility

[simsimkek]

The issue here is era having a fake “200 mm” KE equivalent when it doesn’t work like that at all, it reduces a percentage of kinetic energy of the dart, and that percentage has to do with the dart shape, material and speed. In game it gets a very optimistic and fantastical protection equivalent

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

Prove that it’s underperforming.
Simply stating “in my opinion blah blah blah” means about as much as monopoly money does compared to real currency.

[G3ntl3man95]

there is firepower and armor lower br remain with mobility… nothing magnificient for an 12.3 tank russia have 3bm60 ftom 10.0 -11.0 br