I mean the 6 second reload is literally for the ideal condition of the next round being in the case over, even two cases over and you were already looking at 6.5 seconds. That is an issue with all auto loaders though.
You are also forgetting the turret basket that is just a 5mm aluminum sheet and not modeled as a basket. Because supreme russian turret drives cannot get jammed by 5mm aluminium but weak nato ones can.
Link to the gaijin post in question
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
None of that is made up. Literally. Youre just incapable of proving that it is which is why you claim that it is fantasy.
But dont feel too bad thats the usual reaction of people that immediately jump to the statshame instead of making an argument. If youre scared of the mods then post your argument to me privately or in the russian bias 2026 thread. But im gonna predict that you wont, because you dont actually have an argument. Just empty words and better stats.
It’s pointless to waste time with issues which were already resolved.
You guys just live in your own world. You should be grateful that despite crying so much, you guys spend an obscene amount on this game. That’s the only reason Gaijin still panders to you.
Really? Where is the proof for all the other things?
And do you have anything else than the brochure that doesn’t prove anything about the missile actually existing?
Ofc you don’t, because you’re coping just as hard as the dozens of others before you.
Nothing can prove a mad man out of his fantasy
You just don’t have anything lmao.
Stop coping and admit that you have nothing besides that useless brochure
A brochure - a glorious primary source !!!
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Sources are good if you have any which literally implies to everything i mentioned besides the 38MT.
I love how you most likely didn’t read all the arguments that were provided, and all the counter sources provided against the brochure
Very interesting argumentation, to say the least
Oh he read them. He just literally doesnt have anything besides that brochure, because there isnt anything. Ive had this same conversation too many times on here already and no one could provide anythting that would be considered even remotely a source for any other tech tree.
If you read those arguments you should know the MT is not an issue for WT whatsoever.
We know it existed, it was tested and offered to the RF but declined.
Much more sources than the agm179 tri mode seekers
Maybe.
Show from where we know that. Because 8500 replies in the main thread couldnt prove that.
That document is from a test report on the missle lmao for the export offering …
Really embarassing
No its not lmao its a brochure from an airshow not a test report
And btw still waiting on debunking all the other things.
I am pretty damn sure, the bloody BROCHUUUUREEEEES, are inelligeble as a primary source, via gaijins policy, xrom explained it somewhere around here, i don’t know why we are beating this dead horse, brochures are not the greatest of sources, i feel like its common sense, oh well…
Well according to the thread were in they are fair game now.
