Why is Italy not getting it?
Unless its the technical feasibility of (any Nato aircraft) and (any missile pylon that carries more than half a missile and a rock), then it doesnt count. Then you need to prove it actually happened. Theres a quintuple standard in this game.
If you watch the video the image is taken from; you’ll see that the stabilizer is clearly turned on
3 Likes
are we getting more anti era shells in game?
Why should it? If you mean previously ordered 2A8IT, the order was canceled in favor of KF51 derivative - NMBT.
Spoiler
Unfortunately it still has partially mock-up turret.
Not a 2A8.
That is a 2A7, identifiable by the baskets on the sides of the turret
But in the original video there is written -7.67 degrees as maximum depression on a chart made by the Norwegian army. The YouTube stream doesn’t show it, but the Facebook video and downloadable video from “Forsvarets mediebank” show the text with facts of the tank behind the speakers.
I am wondering if they have limit at -7,67 to give the cannon space to bounce down while being fully depressed, but I don’t know this for sure.
1 Like
They don’t care, the people citing the depression number from a certain document reject the same document for other points. They also ignore that the depression number is only for a specific version of the tank and even then only under certain circumstances.
They nitpick and find the worst numbers possible, then lie to get GJN to nerf something GJN loves to nerf. They however would never allow it to get the upsides and positive aspects which they constantly minimize, handwave away, or outright ignore. Such as proper ammo, armor, etc.
10 Likes
Maybe similar M1A2SEP2, after a few years get these. M1 was also once weakness, Because USA main continuous protests ,Until june 2026 Gaijin finally admit M1 is good tank and buff M1 can have a normal experience.
Nothing was buffed with the abrams (appart from the reload rate but this is not because of data), they still ignored everything regarding DU hull armour
? The Abrams got massive reworks to their damage model and armor layout.
Neck , basket big buff
And DU hull: Although not have data , but we still buff SEP3 hull
The WarThunderDE X account is featuring the Leopard 2A8, but why hasn’t the main War Thunder account posted about it? …Well, you don’t even have to say it. It’s obviously because you’re terrified of getting flooded with negative comments, right?
1 Like
Is Gaijin employing a double standard simply to fabricate the illusion that its employees are hard at work—deliberately using blatantly incorrect documents as primary sources to cover up backlash over the fact that Germany’s Leopard 2A8 is inferior to Norway’s variant in terms of Laser Warning Systems (LWS), top-mounted turret machine guns, and hull side armor (despite what the actual specifications are), only to “correct” them after users point it out?
You should immediately cease such foolish practices that treat your player base with utter contempt. How many years have you been operating this online game?
1 Like
It got a fully volumetric model and correct armor geometry. The armor is now pretty accurate except for the DU hull which iirc still nobody has real data on.
The x account doesn’t post about everything, they haven’t posted about the Olifant, the F/A-18D or the Q-5D either. I think your reading to much into it.
If you have proof of the numbers being incorrect the please provide those sources.
The source used for changing the vertical angle limits is directly from the manufacturer and is still available on their website. Since then there has even surfaced another source with similar (but not exactly the same) numbers from the inauguration of the 2A8 into the Norwegian army. A plack with technical data for the vehicle can be seen in the background.
If you think the manufacturer lists their own data incorrectly you can contact them and ask them to correct it.
Ok so whats the reason then that only the number for the gun limits from that specific source is being used? Why not the numbers from the facebook video from the rollout in norway? Why are the weight numbers from the KNDS source being denied? Its completely arbitrary cherry picking at this point. The numbers very clearly dont line up at all and something is fishy but coincidentally the devs just pick the worst possible number from a source that clearly shows another vehicle?
4 Likes
Has a new report been made with the new source with the differing numbers for the Norwegian version?
No clue, do you have a report for that with a denial answer?
Many users have already provided sources that I also possess as evidence, but the bug report manager replied, “Third-party organizations cannot contradict the manufacturer’s data.”
If that is the case, why is data provided by users sometimes rejected even when it originates directly from the manufacturer?
1 Like