Maybe you could create a list of unused vehicles?
1 Like
Add the Armadillo BR maybe as a Premium?
1 Like
Actually a nice idea, if we find more info about a vehicle we can dig into the bucket and if said vehicle starts to form somewhat complete stats it can be added.
@BHmaster asked me to post this instead because he can’t; the following was written by him:
Hey guys, sorry for my absence.
Yeah that would be a good idea. It was originally in my plans but I would have to make it separate from the main post or it’d risk misleading people into thinking the tree proposal is bloated with vehicles that are all too “same-y” or filled with actual copy-pastes. And then I just forgot about it. It’d help especially Gaijin by showing how many assets they can simply recycle for this tree.
What vehicle is that? The Peruvian planned modification of the M113 with an IFV turret?
In other news, a friend on our discord found a rare photo of the “T-Duplex-57” (naming can vary depending on the source; Cuba’s own ZSU-57-2) with the turret exposed.
If there was any doubt whether if it was a Cuban-made turret or simply a ZSU-57-2 turret installed on a T-54/55 hull, it’s clarified now. Source is tom_nachtrab on X/Twitter.
8 Likes
Thats crazy, can’t wait for the second coming of the 57mil APHE terror
The first coming never ended.
That thing here; the Brazilian Army does not use it, but it is a national Light Armored Vehicle created by DMT Palestras e Treinamentos
4 Likes
I went to see the LATAM ground tree finally, turns out a lot of the tech tree isn’t straight up copy-paste and almost 14k people that could vote on the forums want it. I’d say it’s an inevitability for it to come to the game, as to when I can’t say…
3 Likes
God forbid latin american people to wish for a latin american TT.
7 Likes
The entire representation of this hemisphere is limited to the TAM.
Theres hundred of unique modifications and domestic designs from all of southwestern hemisphere.
It’s bound to have a lot of people pushing for it. Specially if it hung around for a while, people keep trying to expand it and hasn’t been passed yet (people can still vote and reply, bumping it up every once in a while and ensuring new views/votes/replies.)
1 Like
Don’t pay attention to that guy he is also the clown that is saying the unified Korean tree is a bad idea, despite being confirmed is coming at one point
2 Likes
First photo of a Leopard 2A4 CHL modernized by ASELSAN. The photo appears in ASELSAN’s 2025 annual operations report.
Almost all the systems seen on the reference model displayed at FIDAE are installed. The ATS-65 commander’s sight, the KARTALGÖZÜ-200 gunner’s sight, the GÖREN-200 driver’s camera, the meteorological mast, and the EGTDS Electric Gun & Turret Drive System are all visible. The SARP Remote Controlled Weapon Station and the LIAS-400 Laser Warning Receiver are still missing, but according to the CEO of Aselsan, they are planned for future phases of the modernization.
4 Likes
Lately I been thinking about this:
Considering that Gaijin refuse to add coalition nations and that 1 should be the main one, I thinked of 2 possibilities:
-
Spain as the main nation and hispanic-american countries as sub-trees. If we use the Gaijin argument of a country being a subtree of another because was part of (India treatment), and well you know Spain used to control almost all center and south america except some parts of the today Brazil which was Portuguese controlled. This solution would consider Mexico into the TT but not Brazil.
-
Peru as the main nation, and all the south-american countries as subtrees. From 1535 to 1717 the Viceroyalty of Peru, under Spanish rule, encompassed the vast majority of South America, having control over what is now known as Peru, Chile, Argentina, Paraguay, Venezuela, Bolivia, part of Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador. Before being fragmented in 4 since 1717 into: Viceroyalty of New Spain, Viceroyalty of Peru, Viceroyalty of New Granada and Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. This solution would make the TT very subtree dependant (bc Peru doesnt have so many things in compare with Brazil) and but it would exclude Venezuela and Mexico.
But for these 2 options, we could also add the Gaijin argument on proximity, and include the nations that were excepted (a treatment similar to Japan’s subtrees).
The leading nation in that case should be Spain, considering it’s the Hispanic nation with the most vehicles and a strong domestic industry. No offense, but Peru doesn’t have enough to be a leading nation, and its most powerful tank is currently the T-55. The issue is that the other two countries, which would be the secondary nations in the technology tree, would be Chile and Argentina, as they have the most vehicles. The other Latin American countries would only contribute event or premium vehicles. The downside is that Brazil wasn’t part of the Spanish Empire and would therefore be excluded, which is unfortunate.
Yeah Im knower, thats why I said if Peru, it would be very subtree dependant.
Well it could have more subtrees, after all France and Japan have 3 subtrees. And there is no rule against more than 3 subtrees.
Yeah thats the problem with Spain TT. Maybe Gaijin can consider it bc of proximity or probably to another TT.
The thing is, currently in the game, there’s a leading nation that can be accompanied by up to three secondary nations. For example, Japan has Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia, which fill out the air force tree. In this case, Spain would be the main nation, followed by Chile and Argentina, and I’d say Peru, as the third nation, already has interesting air options, plus they’ll now have the F-16V.
I think the maximum is 3 sub-trees. Another example is Sweden, which has Denmark, Norway, and Finland; after that, some nations are used as filler or as premium/event content.
Isn’t United Korea a coalition tree?
i think Argentina could baaaaaaaaaaaarely be it’s own tree, except in naval and helis, and then our Brazilian and Chilean brothers could fill up the rest of the tree
Its south korea with north as subtree. But its kinda more like the China/Taiwan treatment.