Like it didn’t get this bad on the other thread wanting the Czech F-35 for the USSR
1 Like
People love to take after our good friend Alvis here.
2 Likes
well they better get some braincells working cuz jesus christ sake dude.
4 Likes
preach
A little bit politics is unavoidable if you were to talk about vehicle placement.
It’s like if you were to add the Syrian panzer IV to Israel tree. It is double offensive, but it is also political.
we don’t need F-35A for Korea in China, Taiwan it self is already considering to buy the F-35A already.
2 Likes
wait,does that mean china can also get the US m1??
1 Like
Yes
1 Like
Yes
1 Like
we dont need F-35’s if we already got one
we also got the su57 felon
7 Likes
that is actually stupid dude,like what the hell.
Welp Taiwan bought the special upgraded M1A2 Sep 2 (M1A2T) so it a little different from the US one.
same reason why japan doesnt need korea…
Check OP’s theory in this topic…
Well, He gained quite much of infamous due to making lots of troll posts.
But I think he managed to break his record this time.
Lot much worse than ‘I want bomb in J-7D’
4 Likes
north korea tech tree when? and south korea as the sub tree when?
thats why china is the better place cuz it already got some korean stuff
2 Likes
It’s actually downgraded if you were to talk about gameplay purposes (not talking about things like better reliability).
The T variant has FMS armor, and tungsten KE-w series rounds
it will atleast fill in the Gap for China top tier. the Abrams are better compare to the chiniese vehicle.
Would be nice to see. But it would become another Israel tree.
See, with modern vehicles, nation based trees were a mistake to begin with. It should have been like “east Europe, west Europe, Asian, commonwealth” tree something like that. Gets all good stuff while avoiding controverseries
1 Like