Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

HUH? Who siad that, and that was a joke or not?

He is just doing it for attention now I swear

1 Like

Feast upon this.

image (9)
Can you explain this occurence?

Yeah, ive not played it in a while. I wish you could dig holes a lot faster. Best game I ever had, I spent the first 5 minutes digging myself a hole and just defended a flank, came away with 4 ish kills

Ok, ive seen enough. Im leaving

1 Like

what about abrams with no spall shit

what about US massive CAS?

can you explain?

Japan got so many cool variations of planes to add like thse 2 from the J1N1

Spoiler

Spoiler

Yea I think I will head off too got more important thing to deal with then a small bug.

Actually no bugs got more IQ then Alex has so that not fair on zee bugs.

1 Like

Happens far less than with the T-80U/BVM.

You would know that if you played other nations more. Abrams in general have been pretty easy 1-2 shots after the introduction of 500mm+ pen darts.

Bottom one smelling grass lol

Just Imagine the possibilitys with a 20mm turret at BR 1.7-2.0 and interceptor spawn.

1 Like

Wdym “massive CAS”. Did you forget that Russian CAS dominated from Winged Lions to like Drone Age? You could make the argument that SPAA was better, yes. But that goes for both sides. And it’s not the fault of “american mains”

did you forget f-16 exists? a-10? a-6e tram?

and its 100% american mains fault

they are begging for F-15E because F-16C is still not enough

you can check that in WT thread posts & reddit

You remembered them easily but forgot that Sweden isn’t a NATO member

72 comments to go for Part II

Mysto the British did not use the Victor MkE. So yes its origin is British but it was used by every nation’s army but the British army. A prime example is the T-26 Mod 1933. Which is a Victor Mk E that was produced in the USSR but no major modifications were done to its hull nor really the turret.

Another thing the Finnish T-72M1 is different in appearance from the East German T-72M1. Even in appearance that is considered unique.

On the Leopard 2A6 in the German tree it has 4 smoke discharges pointed at an angle, and 2 separated in groups of 2. It’s also mounted with an MG-3. Total 8.

The Finnish Leopard 2A6 though only has 6 smoke discharge launchers, the tracks are also slightly different from the German one.

To put it simply just because it isn’t “unique enough” does not matter. Gaijin’s term Unique means it has to have some changes compared to the original design. It does not mean it needs to be massively internally or externally retrofitted.

Another thing, The BT-42’s Hull is a BT-7(Soviet), the gun is a 4.5 inch/114mm howitzer gun which is British.
The only thing that is Finnish is the turret.

The Finnish T-34, Victor Mark E tank, and BT-42 all use the Finnish Pepper pot muzzle device.
In game though the Finnish T-34 lacks this at the moment.

Clearly Mig-27K Kh-25ML spam wasn’t enough aye. Need Tu-160 with 6 kinzhals.

Battle Rating changes are here: ( https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/17a7war/datamine_2290100_2290105/ )

image
image
image

Probably go into effect tomorrow.

1 Like

I guess hes one of those people who want Su-39 at 10.3 with R-73s, R-27ER and R-77s