Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 1)

next week I think

the museum put out flyers for the AlphaJet Anniversary

Oct 26

I wasn’t quite sure but my thought was true

See, this is exactly what I mean with the semantics and technicalities.

Smin literally came in, stepped in and said, as I quote: “when talking about the future, it does not always mean the next major update or even this year. We can be hinting at things to come in the far future too. Perhaps don’t take things too literally.”

And yet, here we are, discussing whether “technically he didn’t really deny it, he only denied that certain statement was referring to it” or not. Isn’t Smin’s point clear enough? Do we need him to make a full statement denying each singular possible nation for the next update?

1 Like

No we don’t.

Nor do we need to sign a whole checklist before talking about x subject that is currently of interest in the chat.

If people wish to talk about missiles, let then. If people wish to talk about balance, let them. If people with to talk about the potential of certain countries, let them.

1 Like

This is a production model, not a prototype.

France had a prototype called: Larzac

Spoiler

image

Germany has: Ta-501 (Already shown)

1 Like

I’m afraid it is.
This is the Rumor tread, and if you know anything about rumors it’s that they don’t necessarily require a basis.

Even still, there is a certain basis for nation rumors to arise, so I see no reason for this complaint.

1 Like

Brother why do you remove the thing I was meant to respond to 😢

I am trying to add quotes but this Forum is weird and I am not managing well sorry xd

Yeah it’s bugged atm, no worries

1 Like

Except that’s not how this topic works.

As stated at the very top of the topic:

However, please AVOID these types of discussions: Wishlisting.
Vehicle spec discussions, such as armour, ammo, ordnance, guns, data sheets, performance. There’s plenty of threads for these discussions here .

This topic is not a “talk about literally anything war-machinnery related” topic, it’s a topic with the purpose to divulge about content that may actually be coming the next major update.

Just to copy paste my previous answer:

I’m afraid it is.
This is the Rumor tread, and if you know anything about rumors it’s that they don’t necessarily require a basis.

Even still, there is a certain basis for nation rumors to arise, so I see no reason for this complaint.

Despite the statement you posted along with your response, this is basically what happens all the time and is being enforced by the forum moderators, so I see no issue with making use of the space given.

Would we get 2 devblogs today, since the one from yesterday had issues?

Mayhaps.

Issues? What happened?

Except all of these talks do nothing but, indeed, break the rules the Forum moderators try to enforce when they come in and repeatedly state things such as:


[Smin1080p]
"Maybe a Hot take: other topics on the forum exist to talk in and you can also play the game in the meantime whilst you wait :)
You are not compelled or required to have to always keep this topic alive."
.
.

FOR THE RECORD, I understand and think it’s fine for the topic to go off-topic for a bit sometimes, but I always found excessive the way some users manage to talk for hours, hours and hours about off-topic stuff.

2 Likes

there was a vehicle issue. According to Oxy.

2 Likes

No basis for a new nation in the next update, it’s just been soft denied by Smin’s previous comment

1 Like

Although, i would like to have teasers before dev-blogs.

We all would.