Should be, but one could argue we shouldnt even this deep into gen 4 yet
Oh yeah.
There are plenty of leased vehicles in multiple tech trees. Especially RU.
It’s used for training purposes. Why would they use an inferior training jet over their F-35s and Eurofighters?
Make it up? It’s a much closer link than the F-16 lmao.
Source?
yes but now we are and there is a lot stll between mid Gen 4 and Late Gen 4+/ 4.5
better than thr Tornado
Service vehicles though.
All I’m saying is that a South African Gripen would likely make most sense if Gaijin wants to sdd sth. for both tech trees without adding F-18.
Also since the ground units are already in the British tech tree.
They don’t operate any kind of FOX 3s since 2008 when they retired the R-Darter together with the Cheetah…
Yes, that’s why we are asking for it. UK desperately needs something.
Gripenfan is gatekeeping it lmao
I mean, there still was loads of stuff between gen 3 and 4 left as well, just saying that at this rate gen 4.5 isn’t that far away
what a joker,mbt2000’s cannon not 1001’s,same as 99a,577not 588,that just show your ignorance，and then ,why not compare 2000 with t90a?leo2 is a 10.3 tank,your math teacher will cry for this
2 Likes
No need to get hostile.
Imagine complaining about c&p as sweden main
2 Likes
I’m pretty sure the Barak II and F-16C didnt use Sparrows either
Oh no here comes the salty german main…
1 Like
I don’t think the UK is getting either Gripen variants tbh. I’m just pointing out why it’s silly to say the UK shouldn’t get access to it. It’s a double-standard when F-16J and many other vehicles are allowed in the game. I don’t think it will change though.
Yes, if they are willing they can just give it AMRAAMs, but the swedish one will always have advantage, specially at A/G ordnance.
HMM
OHHH NOOO it is 577m penetration not 588 , man cry me a river , that realy isnt that much of a difference the t90 a only has 580mm, man if that is your problem you have massive skill issue
1 Like