The Russian Air Force puts the KH38MT on the su34
2 Likes
What makes you sure it is a MT?? (I wouldn’t have a clue tbh…)
Nose looks like this:
Which is an ML -
7 Likes
It is a KH-38 ML (Laser guided), look at the grid on the seeker.
Here is a close-up photo of the KH-38 ML's seeker.
17 Likes
So back to KH-38MT is a paper weapon that never existed.
17 Likes
not an mt, we’ve seen closeups of ML seekers before and this is pretty much identical
3 Likes
Never existed, and Gaijin Community Managers ahem @Smin1080p_WT @Stona_WT refuse to comment on it, show any sources to prove it exists or even mention that feedback regarding this has been passed along to the developers.
Gaijin could simply end the whole discussion around this, by showing the documents that show its real with proof or just remove the MT entirely. Its not a balanced AGM whatsoever, and no other nation has anything that comes close to it in terms of speed.
15 Likes
Yeah, convenient the thread got closed and never re-opened
6 Likes
Tbf, it went entirely off-topic towards the end.
Here’s what they’ve said every time I’ve asked if Gaijin will put out any statement regarding the missile.
No response to this lol
2 Likes
Yeah… they want the community to prove a negative, which is practically impossible. Would love to hear from a tech mod actually. They have a little bit of an insider perspective, but largely remain outside of it.
I think Gunjob was interested in an answer regarding the exact requirements for a weapon systems introduction, because there are some interesting mockups out there like the Typhoon (ASRAAM meant for A2G)
6 Likes
I believe he responded to the KH38MT existence thread by saying that a picture from a brochure was something in the right direction to show that it exists, but I could be wrong about that. I know a Tech Mod did respond with something useful but again it doesn’t prove existence outside of a mockup.
I don’t think Gaijin CMs or TMs will respond with anything meaningful or at all. (I hope I’m wrong.)
1 Like
It’s not sufficient to passed as a suggestion by a report it shouldn’t be added to the game, once again I’ll point to my attempt to get the GPU-5/A (30mm gun pod found on the A-7, F-5E and a few others)on the F-15A as an example.
You sometimes need to find hyper specific documentation, and even then it goes both ways as an example;
The report for the GPU-5/A 30mm Gunpod to be mounted on the F-15A & -15C was rejected, since I only had pictographic evidence of it mounted to the F-15B that served as the surrogate for testing the F-15E configuration during trials, even though other sources state that it can be mounted on the MAU-12 bomb rack with no modification, and the brochure makes no reference to a specific variant.Further the A-7E also has access to the GPU-5/A even though the USN never purchased any, nor was party to said trials but they were flown on the A-7D, of which the -7E is a modification of, I’d put in a report for its removal but I’m not exactly sure how you are supposed to go about finding “documentation” to prove a negative.
I really don’t know how much more clear you can get than “no modification required”, And further on a “per platform” basis is near impossible.
5 Likes
17 Likes
rage bait used to be believable
here we go again.
it went off topic because the cms literally brigaded the thread. like it was clear they were fishing for reasons to close the thread, as they were not contributing anything valuable to the conversation.
4 Likes
its a pretty huge issue its in the game at all, as if we go by gaijin standards its not even close to being something that would even warrant a suggestion let alone implementation in the game, and its incredibly strong, of course players are still salty about it
1 Like
Thats an ML. Its not an MT(E).
And existing threads about this exists
1 Like