He’s just baiting, common in these threads
Ask vks, it’s unfortunately true.
Politicians love:

Look at the British Harrier 2s with their good-enough RWR
Add more borken to game for better counters
???
Ka-52M will be just straight-up worser Mi-28NM…
Especially if they will go realism way
even if they dont go the realism route it will have at best the same systems as the Mi-28MN but isnt able to carry LMUR double pylons so it can only carry 6 of them
how would you get 6 from 4 pylons?(and iirc only two can do so at same time…)
and no, Ka-52m does not have LDIRCM
outer ones cant handle anything other than igla
The new lamps should be just as effective.
Lol, no.
sir this was about the outer pylons only being able to carry the igla

you cant fault me thinking he reacted to this message

The SP3-1500 arc lamp has the broadband emission to be just as effective, you should do a bit of reading on it.
It still arc lamp.
It’s high intensity and is said to have effectiveness against third generation missiles and a wide range of spectrums.
Where?
Yandex, I would propose looking at a specific module of the aircraft.
The lamp on the Ka-52M (SP3-1500) compared to the initial Ka-52 (SP2-1500) has higher radiant intensity, increased output, higher jamming range and improved spectral efficiency, those are to put it simply, there is other improvements but those aren’t relevant to the lamps effectiveness.
And nothing about IIR seekers…
