It would be so overly peak
I came to the conclusion that the Kh-38MLE is technically possible so I added it to the armament list.
How many LMURs is realistic for the Ka-52M? I see no evidence for or against the APU-L duel launcher on the Ka-52M. Nor am I sure on how the new DIRCM lamp will preform. Will be be more or less like Z-10ME and Mi-28NM?
As for APU-L, I don’t see why it shouldn’t be possible and as for the lamp, I went over this with someone else about it (I think it was this suggestion) it should be able to effect third generation weapons similarly, but who knows how Gaijin will model it.
Well, since the Ka-52M is a mix of the Ka-52K and the Ka-52, and the Ka-52K can carry the Kh-35, it is quite possible that it could carry a similar missile in the form of the Kh-38.
It probably should work the same as the current in game ka-52 lamps work
because the big upgrade here is the addition of UV channel, but the in game one already works on IR + UV guided missiles (like POST stingers) so I cant see why this one will work better
It would work similar but with more effectiveness against more modern threats.
yes, but the biggest feature is being both IR and UV, which the current in game ka52 lamps already act like
it should not work against IIR seekers, and current KA52 lamps in game already work on pretty much everything else
We simply don’t know if it will, for game purposes it might.
thats what I am saying
IRL its an upgrade, but in game the old one is over preforming to the level that this one preforms to IRL
is this a ka-52 variant?
Yes and no its an early Ka-52.
I think the second image is photoshopped
However I have done a suggestion for this helicopter
they’re doing this to me tomorrow!
It seems to me that the main problem is that the Hermes missiles are mounted on the APU-8 or similar device.



Stop lying. Ka-52M has RWR, period.
Just becuse you don’t like the fact it can, it doesn’t mean it can’t.
I might disagree with @Abyss_Revenant but just coming in here and saying nuh uh dosent help anyone
What I like to be true and what is proven to be true are two different things
And it wasn’t proven to be true that the ka52m is able to carry LMUR double pylons
It isn’t advertised with them
It wasn’t shown with them
It only ever was shown with single pylons
But I would happy if you could prove me wrong with sufficient evidence of the ka52m being able to take the double pylon by sending a picture of it or a brochure advertising it
that is, until its russia vs russia

