They’re just Allie’s, it’s doesn’t mean they all need to share a tree.
China has the potential to be incredibly unique, it is simply not realized to a great extent in the lower tiers.
High tiers there are obvious highlights and the tree keeps expanding in unique ways, so I don’t see how it’s a bad addition.
It is still a bad name and concept.
There is no reason Croatia and Ukraine should have to share a tree.
There are several countries in there can have independent trees, some are good combined but not all of them, too bloated.
Doesn’t mean they shouldn’t if it makes interesting addition to the game. This is not an argument against it
Well, not 80. And israel is a bigger example of copycat.
No for 2 reasons.
-
Gaijin has stated multiple times (and most recently in the case of France players asking about a squadron/premium Leclerc) that they will not add any premiums or squadron vehicles that are the current max BR. Given that the K2 would 100% be top BR, it cannot be added as a premium or squadron vehicle. There is also 0 reasoning to add such a vehicle to a country that already is performing very well at top tier ground (Leopard 2/Strv 122 meta go crazy) when there is no Polish sub-TT in the German TT.
-
It would be largely preferred that the K2 be added into the game in the case of a unified Korean tech tree. South and North Korea both have more than enough unique vehicles that could form a unified Korean tech tree.
NO I DO NOT WANT in the game as a polish tank (KOREAN YES TURKISH AS A VARRIANT NAME IS “ALTAY” YES BUT POLISH NO BECAUSE OF NO DIFFERENT FROM K2A2 BLACK PANTER) .
Other countries having the stock config of a certain tank has never stopped them from copy pasting… (see the Hungarian, Swedish and Finnish Leo2A4s and the finnish leo2A6). If they ever add a polish tree, they’ll definitely add the black panther.
Damn dude chill out it’s not like a future korean tech tree couldnt get it
if there was a future korean sub tree what nation would best suited to get it?
USA makes the most sense but obviously they aren’t exactly in need of it
none, that has been denied . only japan would have worked as asian one but the relations dont work out
wouldnt work either because the "5 line "excuse
I still don’t understand this 5 line thing
apparently adding a slider on the bottom of the tech tree would take the entire dev brainstorm activity for an entire year
When every major update introduces a bug that takes months/years to fix, that’s not really that surprising
agree for sure but not for german tt…
who knows gaijin’s plans about it???
I mean, the 5 line excuse also really only works for dedicated lines. Yet with Britains SA Gripen, Italian Heli tree (and various ground vehicles of all subtrees) we have seen that combinesd lines can be a thing.
The only precedent all had on common was one dedicated line in at least one mode, and wouldn’t you know it, the heli trees of all nations would technically allow for that.
I guess you could argue for specifically a dedicated ground line, but even then Gaijin is not bound to any rules at all. All we have to consider when suggesting things is to provide a possible solution for a problem, wether it is a solution Gaijin had before or not is irrelevant.
Then again in the specific context of a US subtree I think we are far from needing it. Maybe Germany could use some help though with the way top tier air is turning out.
probably will put the polish modified version instead of a copy paste
if UK ends up getting the leopards, then germany sure as heck can get the black phanter, but currently yeah germany doesnt need it
i dont doubt even a single bit gaijin will put it as a sub tech tree and not as a whole tech tree in fact i would be surprised if it was put as a whole tech tree, and considering the other trees in game the most logical one its the US but again like what shini said
as for another option sadly most reallistic one would be japan tech tree, just cuz gaijoob works are out of the human comprehension, anyways the only other option would be china and that one would be even worse