P sure C’s STR is around 20-24 idk if its reflected in game. But then when it comes to reporting E model you can always report it thru other factors such as acceleration to certain speeds, climb rate, etc.
It is a last minute addition as are most things added to the swedish tt now that you clearly have no interest in relevant or smart discussion consider yourself on ignored for the next 6 months as per usual with you
1 Like
posted a report for the sensor fusion and l16/tidls datalinks, praying now
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YGRpQBSwp1ip
5 Likes
Hello again, will you stick around this time for a conversation or just leave? The post you replied to is just me informing that guy about it’s IRL TWR differences
39E is still mostly copy-paste of 39C in dev afaik? I can’t enter dev server on console so can’t check. But I saw someone post some statshark comparison earlier of both FM’s where 39E was basically slightly worse in both STR and ITR. So I assume they’ve got it right? If weight was actually 7100kg and it had the current stated thrust, it certainly wouldn’t underperform the 39C right now lol. I think someone said that it felt much heavier today.
If not, I’d be seriously impressed if Gaijin actually think it weighs 7100kg… I’ve never seen a single source saying it weighs that, everything from SAAB says 8000kg. I have not seen many changes at all to the 39E in datamine, so I think it’s still being configured
They just use channel loss as a tool to adjust things, nerf thrust and they’ll just compensate buffing the drag. I doubt they’re interested in changing the entire FM just so it shows slightly more accurate thrust in-game… Have there ever been a bug report that adjusted channel loss in-game?
2 Likes
its also a ton too light in game rn
they used gripen NG weight instead of E
JAS 39NG’s more mass cause double seat, I think the Empy Mass JAS 39E was correctly. I guess you are wrong about that
nope
according to SAAB its 8000kg empty
while in game its 7120kg empty
so yeah its missing a ton
the in game weight was pulled from this or other sources for the gripen NG
4 Likes
I guess your document is fake. That’s JAS 39NG double seat correctly 10 pages then why your doc 2 pages only ?
its not
its from an earlier point in the program though, before some weight was added
and your source agrees that the in game one is missing a ton
1 Like
It doesn’t allignw with what I believe so it must be fake.
Now this is the fun stuff.
4 Likes
The pict’s telling about JAS 39NG then you say missing a ton in JAS 39E? JAS 39NG and JAS 39E is absolutely same just different single and double seat
why dont you try to find a source for the gripen E that doesnt show it missing a ton in game?
because everything from SAAB shows it as 8000kg
also the numbers in your source are for the gripen E, they exactly match the official numbers for gripen E from SAAB
1 Like
Read the texts inside the pict first then I tell you more details also.
you mean the part where it says its using the gripen E as an example?
which would logically mean the stats given are for the gripen E
3 Likes
It is they are telling story about JAS39NG, E, C/D. that pict’s JAS 39NG, read the first paragraph
You’re like the people that say the su-35 is somehow 16-17000 kg even though it’s literally stated at 19000 kg empty weight from manufacturers themselves except you’re doing it for gripen e
1 Like
I don’t know about sukhoi then they are too much different and variants
1 Like
That’s… Some creative reasoning… The dual seat version is the 39F
2 Likes
nah was just making a comparison
Finally, I got the source about my document JAS 39NG