What do you mean?
The current jas39e in the dev server, has the jas39c wings model, if I remember correctly, unless they changed it
I still think this is on the lower end of its performance but its a step in the right direction
Its basically a 5% channel loss. That’s absolutely fine in my opinion.
It has never had the C wings on DEV, the JAS39E came with the 3D model completed (the only thing wrong is the trailing edge flaps).
1 Like
Is the backing of the MFD the right colour? It seems too harsh.
Only familiarity I have with this rubbish is knowing the abysmal orange colour of our training aircraft mfd.
Is the Gripen E really worse in both instantaneous and sustained turn, even though it has a higher TWR than the C?
That’s kinda strange
1 Like
Sort of, the IRL MFD can be customized pretty heavily.
That’s a bit unfortunate, it is jarring to the eye 😿
2 Likes
Wish we could go back to the good old Gripen A cockpit.
90s MFDs >>> flat screen tv
push your report about that
If they aren’t going to model the wide one proper, then yea, you get more worth from the other. But if they do model it proper, would be better. Still look horrendous, but work better.
I don’t care about that small thing, I focus with AESA and 9 missiles
It’s not a matter of if you care or not, but rather of making it as accurate as possible
4 Likes
For the love of all that is decent, we get it. Doubling down for the Nth time on a bug report that everyone’s already aware about thanks to @Michael-IR will not allow us to expand the breadth of errors reported effectively. We know the wing is wrong, but that issue is so shallow I dare say it is unfathomable for there is not enough to measure a fathom against.
The issue is known, the issue has been actioned to the extent we can. Instead of constantly focusing on it, help improve accuracy across the board.
I hope tonight payload issues will be done
How is the acceleration looking on this thing? Is it near Euro and Rafale level?
No idea sadly and i don’t know how to properly check either.