The E in Swedish service uses the Targo system.
For a single engine jet its not that harsh, like a 2-5% loss iirc
They said it is 20% faster than C engine like my number of kgf in report
Realistically in terms of game convention i would guess that the E will get similar % loss as the C got.
Would be better to get STRIKER/COBRA though, it’s just a better HMD and if theres grounds for addition then it makes sense
can you look at this reports
Community Bug Reporting System vor targo2/JHMCS2
Community Bug Reporting System vor targo2/JHMCS2
Community Bug Reporting System vor HMD on gripen e
The C version uses Cobra as far as i know.
How is the cobra be better?
1 Like
why is it better
Found a few more mentions of the mica compatibility for the gripen, hope its enough
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/22DBMZwD7B6O
1 Like
Newer, better symbology, should work better with Arexis too
Closed already 💀
rejected lol
where’s the image
JHMCS 2 is also very modern so it is enough vor Gripen e
Why are you campaigning for an actively worse HMD
why not, maybe its not worse we dont know. and its realistic
That a JAS39C.
I mean software, and pylon wise Gripen C is not different from the E variant just less advanced
I personally don’t care if it’s better or worse, i want it as close to the in service version as feasibly possible.
2 Likes
i doubt they removed the compatibility on the E, that would negatively impact export potential
1 Like