As nice as this would be, i find it very unlikely that gaijin would give it the mica
Yeah, could be that too
Though Striker 1 (Typhoon) has had that reported for a while and not added yet
updated the list and made it clearer
Yeah but it’d be funny.
2 Likes
one of the IRL benefits of the gripen E is its high compatibility with many weapons, I don’t see why that shouldn’t be reflected ingame honestly
1 Like
What IRST reports ar ther and what IRST use the gripen e
Because you know if it was, everyone who doesn’t have an interest in Sweden or the Gripen would be spitting. So unfortunately, I doubt we’ll see that benefit modeled.
I would prefer something more grounded like AIM-120C5 instead of advertised missiles that werent even mounted as a mockup. Even Python had it better and I’d prefer that honestly:
I prefer AIM120C-8 as the best AMRAAM for Sweden than it
list of reports here:
so you’d prefer the worst top tier fox 3 in the game over the best one?
1 Like
i dont know much about gripen e but is the a difret to NG ?
what about the radar? What are the horizontal and vertical gimbal limits ingame?
Since when is AIM-120C5 the worst? I prefer my Gripen to stay consistent and not receive some imaginary weaponry it never mounted or tested.
200x180
Should be a copy of Typhoon’s radar
1 Like
Unfortunately, people want AMRAAM to be pulling 50gs off the rail and its current performance is not good enough in spite of the fact it is the best BVR missile and a completely passable shorter range option provided you’re not at sub 5km.
So they’ll claim the MICA is best in spite of notable deficiencies.
Nope the gripen radar got 20km more range
1 Like
Shame we can’t choose the pylons it fits to. Stuck with 8 and only on the innermost pylons.