JAS-39E for Sweden

It’s new, barely configured. It’ll likely be fixed before live. Probably. If they bother.

I have absolutely no faith in this, but it might work out. Maybe.

How many the countermeasures you know? I think biggest countermeasures still at f18c mlu2 1400 countermeasures

It is the f18mlu2, but I think the second one is the jas39c

probably they will add more BOL for JAS 39E cause have 10 hard points

BOL are not compatible with wingtip or belly pylons

Shouldn’t the Gripen E have some kind of voice-warning system?

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/77EKtlIaQQgu
Report on Gripen E missing the Targo HMD, and it’s features

2 Likes

Yeah, they did not added JAS 39E HMD yet. Probably this HMD will be changed after major update like other vehicles

We got the model now just to wait and see how much they screw us over with the loadouts/munitions

2 Likes

Tomorrow probably will be finished

I procrastinated my studies and created a report for the trailing edge flaps instead: Community Bug Reporting System

( Priorities! :D )

7 Likes

Triangle*-ifying the Gripen wing obviously most important thing.

*Couldn’t remember the correct shape name.

Nice!

Are you doing an MFD report too? I saw you posted some good pictures earlier

All the way back to Viggens - yes they all should

Not planning on it currently. Feel free to use the images and sources for your own report though.

Made a report for the SPICE 1000 for gripen E
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gwtIWXIEKOmc

Current list of Gripen E reports:

3D model and textures:

[DEV] The front landing gear on the JAS 39E is extended too far. Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E missing extended trailing edge flap. Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E inaccurate MFD/WAD (Wide Area Display) Not applied

[DEV] Gripen C/E Incorrect missile pylon Accepted

[DEV] Modeling error on the JAS39E Not applied

[DEV]JAS39E current cockpit model error Not applied

Weaponry and loadouts:

[DEV] Gripen E missing spice 250 FIXED

[DEV] JAS39E missing RBS.15 mk4 “Gungnir” Anti ship missile Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E Gripen missing SPICE 1000 Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E gripen missing belly hardpoints Accepted

[DEV] JAS39E GRIPEN E Missing MICA Missiles Not enough info

(DEV) Gripen E missing Derby AA missile Not a bug

[DEV] JAS39E GRIPEN Can carry 16 SPICE 250 bombs instead of 8 ?Accepted?

[DEV] JAS39E should have access to AIM-120C Not applied

[DEV]JAS39E missing dual missile racks Not applied

JAS39E is missing the LITENING 5 targeting pod Not applied

Flight performance:

JAS 39 GRIPEN E WRONG ENGINE Not a bug

Systems:

(DEV) Targo 2/JHMCS 2 hmd missing “blue forces tracker” Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E uses wrong HMD, missing JHMCS II features Accepted

(DEV) Targo 2/JHMCS 2 hmd missing Display of threats Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E incorrect implementation of IRST SKYWARD D Not applied

[DEV] Gripen-E Does Not Have Upgraded RWR Not applied

[DEV] JAS39E unable to slave RB99s to IRST Not applied

9 Likes

I hope someone is doing the air to air loadout report…I believe someone said it can carry up to 9 ARH and 1 IR.

I have no sources on loadouts other than it has 10 hard points.

I don’t think we’re going to need a report for that. Smin said It’s still in its ‘configuration stage’, and missing some things. Currently the loadouts are just directly copied from the 39C. I doubt they’re unaware of it’s loadout (7x fox 3 + 2x fox 2).

1 Like

Well, I hope you are right. The Spice 250 was reported and accepted. I have also been surprised at some loadouts from Gaijin. If I had an actual source, I would report it just in case. Smin did encourage reporting asap since timelines to update are tight.