its probably coming dont worry
11 Likes
dev already said its coming
10 Likes
Dev said its coming it just isnt finished yet
I might have missed it during dev stream, when did they mention this?
at the end of the English one
5 Likes
They implied it but i don’t think they explicitly stated it :P (but yeah, that is a heavy implication lol)
(Timestamped to 59:54)
https://www.youtube.com/live/8TfGbDDd6T8?si=5VGm8wlR93xeL3_O&t=3594
2 Likes
And then devs are adding another f18 :D
Pretty sure they said it just isn’t ready for the current dev.
its coming soon
They said something about a swedish plane, didnt say gripen e. The ng might come instead
Can’t wait for it to underperform because of a competitor document that contradicts all other sound sources, just to stop major nation players from crying.
7 Likes
We will just need to stand together as a swedish community and proov them wrong
And promptly be ignored, just like what occurred with the Gripen C.
Sadly yes
What do you mean?
As far as i’m aware Gripen C has not only got all it had in service but also extra armament on top of that that were only proven to be possible but never used in service (The things missing currently are things not yet in the game otherwise or aren’t mechanics in the game yet). I might be forgetting something though, i’m not 100% certain on this.
Agility is substandard to estimations applied for others, climb rate is substandard, radar is substandard. But I’ve had this argument enough that I can’t be bothered rehashing it. Through a myriad of undocumented changes it has fallen from reasonably accurate with a few outliers to quite below the par, whilst still overperforming in a number of ways that were never addressed.
If thats the case we could see the gripen e with michas
“substandard”? Do you have sources to prove that it’s in need of changes to more closely match the IRL aircraft? (I’ve made a report on the radar but since the JAS39C is not denoted as a specific MS version it’s still the dev’s discretion if in-game upgrades are needed or not).
If you are talking about the flight model i think it’s a limitation of the game engine in some ways, i’ve screenshots of the JAS39 previously being able to reasonably fly with both it’s wings shot off.
The proof has been provided by many, many times. I do not care to continue arguing it, because it will have the same results as every other time: “We have a document from a competitor that proves these other sources wrong in spite of its dubious providence”. You could prove everything under the sun, and nothing would change, so why bother trying again.
We argued about the gripen ng one time and i gave up because i got tired. However your last argument was wrong. Did you even read what it said in the link? You provided zero evidnece, and they called it “gripen demo” and not gripen e. You were honestly just dragging it out and making it a pain, trying to justify something that was obviously wrong. You are arguing semantics.