Yeah, well, it’s developed in the western hemisphere so our AESA can’t be better than ruskie PESA, didn’t you know?
Think it was down to 185°
1 Like
seems accurate, when i was a kid i heard someone describe danish as someone speaking with a hot potato in their mouth (im finnish)
Hey, Russia did good with their radars after they finally decided the Duga was not an adequate replacement for competent airborne radars.
Though they definitely didn’t do this well.
this reminds me of a gripen walk around
That is correct. I’ve summarized the key details of the Swedish video here: SAAF JAS-39C Technical Data and Discussion - #4617 by InverseBits
I find no place where they mention larger engine intakes. The only thing close is the extra cooling air for the electronics that enter to the side of the engine intakes.
Ahh then i might have missunderstood it
2 Likes
However what is interesting and i think is not implemented is the irst woth the range mentioned
2 Likes
IRST seems consistently worse than it ought to be on the platforms that have it.
You could say that :) Although some say the Danes just have a potato stuck in their throat
Has an accepted report been made for the engine?
Id still like to try and get the micas and r-darters ln the gripen e. Any info on that other then “it can carry it”
2 Likes
It has the actual Gripen E thrust now, with some channel loss like all other vehicles in game
Yeah which is why i ignored it yesterday but if its below the F18Es thrust then theres issues (single engine thrust)
Give me a moment to check.
Seems on parity.
would be best to check in a test drive with local host or statshark if thats up to date with gripen
This is actually a realy good point
It seems near enough to correct? But I also am not even sure anymore.
