Well, then the that Draken would be useless.
This Draken has RWR, Flares and Chaff, but for what if it can only carry Aim9P? Rear aspect Missel, RWR for zero use as Aim9P br has not so many SARH missels, Chaff for what? To scratch my enemy airframe?
I mean, what is wrong with Gajin? Do I relly need to look up documents to show them that my plane carries Aim9P-5?
For any custom skin creator, if you are out of ideas, I have forund something for you:
If you have them, sure.
I did provide original manual of the MIRO explicitly mentioning the AIM-9P, and the bug report was accepted, just so far has not been actioned upon yet.
I think what weapons aircraft in WT carry still is a major balancing tool. In the case of Swiss aircraft for example most weapons are implemented wrong:
yes please
Yeah, i will find some official ( secret ;) ) documents and put it on my suggestion.
I just do the F-35 and the F-35WDNS as for the IRCCM part we could technically just get a J35J with 6x RB72 lol
Again you’ll need proof. The AJS in game has 6x pylons which can carry RB74 but SAAB was worried that carrying 9L on the outer pylons may cause damage overtime due to the weight when performing maneuvers. We have the docs stating they can use them but gaijin wants images of them with the missiles on those pylons which so far I’ve never seen.
Yeah i will look for some proof… but for a foto, it might be imoossible, as they only use 2 missels.
Im planning to go to an achrive, but our is so comolicated, i still dont know how to get acsess to the archive.
I have thought about your suggestion for proof. I thought, if this plane is going to be 10.7- 12.3 , 2 missles aint enough, even in a 10.7 br, 4 is just medium. So i think gajin would be forced to give it 4 missels, but if intercreptord would have a use, then 2 missels is just fine. And the plane would be unenjoyable with 2 missels
Tbh it really depends on the plane, for example the Mirage F1 has effectively two useful missiles (not that it does very well at 12.0, but it’s mostly a compression issue).
Also why do you call them missels lol
?
Should i call them super duper high intellegent ballistc terminator rocket with AI caculator?
( I’m pretty sure you call them Missel as Rockets are erodynamic shaped metal with a powerful miter attached)
fyi it’s “missiles”, not “missels”
The F-5A(G) is 11.0 with 2 9L only. And the Jaguar IS is like 11.3 with 2 Magics only
Ohhhhhhh my stupid brain. ( when i say missiles it hears like missel.)
Are they competible?
The F-5A is fine, I mainly use the 20mm cannons for kills. The Jaguar is better but that flight model is really bad for the BR so you’re missiles are the only redeeming factor. It’s kinda meh but 2 IRCCM missiles do exist at 11.3 @Morvran he might have it
Yeah, I do, and it’s meh. I know a few who enjoy messing about with the magic IIs at that BR but I much prefer the GR1 or GR1A Jags at the lower BRs for actually player a striker. Especially in ASB.
Only time I really play it is in GSB where you get a better tpod and 1 extra GBU
Yeah, im not an Air expert, i dont know how this draken would be like in warthunder.
But look. 2 or 4 missels it doesnt matter. What i need to look for is actual proof for Aim9P-4 and 5.
If the J35Ö jsut get thr Aim9P, it useless, we csn argue : its unnessery, we have the Danish F35, same same.
