J-35J DRAKEN missile ( RB27 ) is SARH and NOT IR

The Missile that is coming to the J-35J DRAKEN is RB27, and ITS SARH AND NOT IR, the IR version is the Rb28 and NOT Rb27.

Rb27= radar guided ( SARH ). (HM-55)

Rb28= IR guided. (HM-58)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/zso4a4/rb_27_sarh_for_draken_j_35_xs/
Sources:

AIM-26 Falcon – Wikipedia

Robot 27 Falcon Radar - Ängelholms Flygmuseum

Robot 27 och Robot 28

2 Likes

You can bug report it here: Gaijin.net // Issues (just search a bit first so that you don’t report something that is already reported and known about)

A guide on how to report bugs can be found here: ([Navigation] Technical Knowledge Base | War Thunder Wiki)

3 Likes

then surely they can add both variants the ir and radar one

2 Likes

It’s just a placeholder, like the german fockewulf missile that was ir on dev too

1 Like

Very possible, Hopefully they wont leave it without changing the guidance unit.

there wasnt any ir version of the falcon

Have you looked at any of the material OP posted?

superfalcon u mean. AIM-26 i think

The AIM-4 aka. RB-28 was IR guided (GAR-2 with the IR-seeker from the GAR-4 or aka. The HM-58/AIM-4C ). The RB-27 aka the AIM-26B was semi-active radar guided: GAR-11, which we improved the proximity fuse later on with the introduction of the J35J. We never had a IR guided RB-27. Everything you need to know is in my suggestion I made. (Along with OP’s post)

Hehe, I think you got the wrong one: I actually also said there’s SARH as well as IR Falcons, in response to @Rojasrz34-live’s claim there was no IR Falcon… ;-)

Ohhh yes yes, you’re right about that. As the intended plan was to acquire the AIM-4 Falcon with a SARH seeker. Which the missile had too low explosive yield. Which was the reason why we opted for the AIM-26, aka. RB-27 instead. (Which is also in my post).

But it seems as I confused with something else entirely.

1 Like