J-15T: The Flying Shark

The name is not publicly known, then again devs can always name it like how they named other unknown Chinese radars, such as HQ-11 TA/PGZ-625 TA

1 Like

it gets BOL which gives it way more flares

no the F15C-GE doesnt have a good FM the J15T in a dogfight can fight on par with the SU30SM2

it can beat the SM2 in all speeds but stall because of TVC its also lighter than SM2

it is slanted, very easily to seen by the slanted radome (and most likley fixed array too, like every other modern CHN plane)

We went from

To

Just a longer guidance time and GNSS =(

No reason to play this over SM2 in any scenario

6 Likes

What if we just like how it looks tho?
That’s a reason

trust the process, gaijin knows where it is all time

Thats only when stock, once spaded it has the same amount as the french one

1 Like

It seem to me that they have chaff atleast.

Just put PLA skin on SM2 and you are good

“Why play EFT when you can take a Rafale and put German/British roundels on it”

They are both flankers, Rafale and EF2000 gameplay are actually different

1 Like

The entire point of my remark was aesthetics. If you think a Flanker D and a Flanker H look the same, I just don’t know what to tell you man

2 Likes

Yeah, gaijin that’s cool and all but give us the WW1 planes and Zeppelin now

Disrespectful

1 Like

watch this plane also have a fictional 360 degree MAWS just like its chiense predecessor

The R-77-1 is better than the PL-12 in every single way. It not only pulls way harder, but also has significantly more energy and shorter time to target. The Su-30SM2 also gets the R-27ER. This is a borderline insane take.

Worse at relevant altitudes.

Less ARH which is what the meta favours.

What? The Su-30SM2 has the most meta radar in the game with the ability to literally launch and keep lock on targets almost behind the plane. The J-15T is stuck with a fixed plate AESA which doesn’t even let it utilise the removed launch angle limits of the PL-12A.

5 Likes

Many such cases

It’s something I’ve wanted to report for a while but I feel like they’ll count literally pointing out the sensors (or lack thereof) as guesswork so I don’t think it’s reportable. Only the J-11A and J-10C should have all aspect MAWS, J-11B and J-15T are rear aspect only.

1 Like