If you have a bunch of situational ways to defend against missiles then use them in those situations and don’t put yourself in a situation where you need chaff.
It’s that simple.
Theres no end all be all way to defend without chaff there’s just a bunch of situational ways that you use in various situations.
Current game design doesn’t offer that luxury lol. You will not be always provided with a situation where you can count on one of those gimmicks. There are too many players in a small area with a big engagement range and those are a lot of variables to cover for. Unless you play very defensively and go back to hangar empty handed in most of the matches.
Chaff doesn’t work 100% either, when you find yourself in a situation where it isn’t gonna work do you just give up?
Notch + chaff works 100% under pure missile guidance, that % does down if data link is involved but you can still fool the missile radar seeker once it is close enough by spamming a lot of chaff, it’s not 100% but reliable than the other tactics.
If we are talking about reliability numbers, multi pathing works 50% of the time, others are less than 25% considering how situational they are.
Multipathing works more like 90% of the time and seeing as I get a lot of kills on people flying high i doubt your numbers there.
False, it is highly situational and is only somewhat reliable on even surfaces like water. Radar missiles pose a credible threat even then if they are fired at an high angle.
WT sub-reddit and forums are littered with posts (direct or indirect) about radar missiles ignoring multipathing.
Here’s a proof Multi pathing doesn't always work! - Clipped with Medal.tv
I’ve had so many kills against multi pathers while I was flying high, They might dodge a missile or two but they always eventually die from an high angle shot.
Bruh, you seem to be negative K/D on 5/6 ARH platforms that you’ve played. Only if you hadn’t relied on multipathing so hard. I am the one who should be doubting your claims here.