Because it sets people priorities, I managed to use the FCU and grind most of the Japanese top tier.
It gives an player that extra option if they wanna switch trees or not and give a taste on what it’s about.
But also like said 117 that totally didn’t fit in the tt at all.
passive research while playing and researching something else, whats the problem in that?
Not having to grind for a couple hundred hours in a new tree or thew vehicle being unique in one way or another is sufficient.
I like that things like the post falklands shar is a squadron vehicle for example. Not much different from the TT one but has its own thing at the same time, it would have been pointless in the TT as its so similar and it would suck for it to be a premium, especially as we have T10 slightly above it now and is far better in every aspect.
F117 would have been better as an event vehicle in the same way as AVRE petard was. Doesnt really fit in with WTs typical gameplay style, has limited abilities so has to be significantly lower than its era peers for balance.
Squadron vehicles tend to be vehicles you can unlock to dip your toes into how a tech tree plays. F117 is probably the worst choice for this possible. An AV8 or sabre would have been a better choice for sqdn vehicle
yea, but which one is the average person gonna recognise more. Generic cold war fighter or the legendary stealth bomber. its status is pop culture will attract more people to it than the A4 giving a worse gameplay experience.
I love when the community repeatedly and vehemently wishes for their own backs to be whipped with topics like this, goes for economy topics too or balance topics