Isu-152-2/isu-152-1

The ISU-152-2 is a prototype modification of the ISU fitted with a much larger howitzer
A prototype was developed in 1944. In April 1944, in an attempt to increase the firepower of the ISU-152, a high-powered variant of the self-propelled gun was developed at Factory No. 100, designated ISU-152BM (ИСУ-152БМ) , sometimes referred to as the ISU-152BM-1 or ISU-152-1. The factory’s designation was Object 246 (Объект 246). The “BM” (“БМ”) designation means “High Power” (“Большой Мощности”). The main purpose of the ISU-152BM was to fight against heavily blinded tank destroyers such as the Elefant and Jagdtiger. It was armed with the BL-8 (БЛ-8) 152.4 mm long-range cannon, which, unlike the ISU-152’s cannon, was not a howitzer cannon. The cannon had a maximum range of 18,500 meters (20,232 meters), with a high explosive design of 43.56 kg (96.0 lb), which had a muzzle velocity of 880 meters per second (2,887 ft/s). The overall length of the cannon was over 8 meters (26 feet), with a barrel length of 7,620 millimeters (300 inches) (50 calibers). The armor-piercing design, weighing 48.78 kg (107.5 lb), had a muzzle velocity of 850 meters per second (2,800 ft/s).
transferir (3)
However, this tank is not without drawbacks. It of course reloads slowly being a 152mm cannon, but the cannon itself is extremely long and prone to getting shot at. Moreover, the cannon only has 2 degrees of gun depression and laser-thin horizantal guidance, meaning that the chassis has to be aimed by moving the entire tank around - which is a huge drawback considering ISU tanks have the turn time of a battleship.
isu
transferir (2)

A good BR for this would be around 5.7-6.0, Since Sturer Emil is at 4.3 for reasons of speed and armor, the ISU could not be placed at BR’s higher than 6.3, after all, War Thunder is a game where mobility and speed are more important than a strong cannon or heavy armor, since it’s chassis has no armor or mobility, but the gun can delete an M103 by looking at it.
ses9lanc06101

Are you confusing two different prototypes, because if I remember right ISU-152-1 mounted BL-8 152mm and 152-2 mounted improved BL-10?
Second picture is often quoted being 152-2 just because BL-10 had slightly shorter barrel, but hard to really say anything when all shots are angled.

3 Likes

How versions of the same thing do we need?

1 Like

I really believed that both were the same prototype, but I don’t think it would make much difference, they both have a monstrous 152mm cannon
a7D78Kx_700b
you mean this one? seems like the barrel is not that long like the other

well, I think both will do the job perfectly.

There seems to slight difference between penetration and I think BL-10 breech was improved that increased rate of fire. Yeah outside of that really doesn’t matter is it 1 or 2 that is added.
I think 6.3 would be good place for it at start to see how effective it is. Gun has around same penetration as JT but drops of faster. It is more mobile then Sturer or JT, but lacks armor of JP and JT.

I have not see any report that states the velocity of HE, but if it was even 30% better it would make this one beast of a tank to kill anything.

Prototypes also lack DshK that other ISUs have, but if added it would give it quite decent AA ability to defend itself.

I’m all for it to be added. Would like more WW2 vehicles even if they’re just prototypes.

try this site

owo???

power comparison between the IS2 and the ISU-152-2

that tank would be a great event vehicle, they should make the isu-152-2 a tech tree vehicle and the isu-152-1 a event vehicle, since it has a slightly better gun