Israeli Leased & Evaluated MiG-29A 9.12 - Testing the Enemy

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

G’day lads. I want to suggest an Israeli tested Polish MiG-29, specifically the 9.12 variant, where it was also painted in the IAF 253 Squadron emblem :)

image

Description:

Spoiler

The MiG-29A 9.12, also known as the MiG-29 “Fulcrum-A,” is a twin-engine air superiority fighter aircraft developed by the Mikoyan design bureau in the Soviet Union. It was designed to counter U.S. fighters such as the F-15 Eagle and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. The MiG-29A 9.12 is known for its agility, high-performance capabilities, and advanced avionics systems. This agility is achieved with it’s RD-33 engines, paired with it’s light weight. It is equipped with a Phazotron N019 radar, helmet-mounted sight, and an IRST system, allowing for effective target acquisition and engagement. The aircraft is armed with a 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon and can carry a variety of air-to-air missiles, including R-27, R-60 and R-73’s. This one was leased and evaluated/tested by Israel, where they said that it’s a worthy opponent if flown by a professional.

image

History:

Spoiler

In 1997, the Israeli Air Force acquired three MiG-29 “Fulcrum” fighter jets from a secretive source, which was later found out to be Poland. These jets were brought to Israel under a veil of secrecy, allowing Israeli test pilots to thoroughly study and understand the aircraft and its weapon systems. For many weeks, the Israeli pilots engaged in extensive testing, flying numerous hours and evaluating the MiG-29’s capabilities against Israeli fighter jets. The 253 Squadron were the ones who tested the Fulcrum, with their emblem also being painted on all 3 of the aircraft.

image

image

Major N, the Chief Experimental Pilot of the MiG, noted that the MiG-29’s performance was comparable to, and in some respects surpassed, that of the F-15 and F-16 jets. The presence of these MiG-29s provided the IAF with a rare opportunity to closely examine one of the primary jets used by it’s enemies.

The Israeli pilots had to undergo special training to familiarize themselves with the MiG-29’s unique structure and systems. The language barrier was a significant challenge, as the aircraft’s documentation and voice warning systems were in Russian, requiring the use of translators and improvisation.

Despite these challenges, the pilots quickly adapted to the MiG-29, labeling cockpit instruments with English translations. They observed notable differences between the Eastern and Western approaches to jet construction. The MiG-29 featured advanced systems such as an automatic landing system and stabilization aids for pilots experiencing vertigo, which are systems not found in Western aircraft.

image

The IAF pilots conducted daily test flights, rigorously analyzing the MiG-29’s performance and weapon systems. The aircraft’s maneuverability, high thrust-to-weight ratio, and advanced avionics made it a formidable opponent in air combat. Major N praised the MiG-29’s radar and infrared search-and-track systems, which provided significant advantages in air-to-air combat.

image

However, the MiG-29’s human engineering had its drawbacks. Major N pointed out that while the individual systems were generally good, their combination and user interface were cumbersome and needed improvement.

Lieut. Col. G, who flew both the MiG-29 and the American F-18, noted the resemblance between the two jets. However, the MiG-29 was primarily designed for air combat, while the F-18 also served as an attack aircraft.

Bonus history (from the book listed in sources):

Spoiler

The trials took place at Sedom airbase in the Negev Desert, southern Israel. The two units conducting the trials were No.601 Squadron (the IDF/AF Flight Test Centre) and No.253 Squadron “Negev,” which operated the F-16A/B Fighting Falcon (called Netz by the Israelis). No.601 Squadron examined the MiG-29’s systems and explored its flight envelope, while No.253 Squadron was responsible for dissimilar air combat training (DACT) evaluation.

The MiG-29s retained their standard two-tone grey camouflage with the Polish ‘chequerboard’ insignia, and the unit badge of the 1st Fighter Regiment (1.PLM) was painted over in a lighter shade of grey (see the first image in the history section). The red/white badge of No.253 Squadron was carried on the fins, but the IDF/AF roundels were not applied. The preparatory stage of the tests posed several challenges, including translating all technical manuals into Hebrew and providing Hebrew-worded labels for the cockpit’s warning lights and critical switches. The audio warning system’s messages remained in Russian.

After lead-in training, each Israeli pilot involved in the evaluation flew 20 DACT sorties in the MiG-29 against the McDonnell Douglas F-4E (locally known as the Kurnass), the F-15A/B (locally known as the Baz), and the F-16A/B. The Israeli pilots rated the MiG-29 as excellent and a dangerous opponent in dogfights. They found the Shchel’-1UM helmet-mounted sight to be comparable to the systems developed in Israel for the F-16C Barak and F-15.

An Israeli military spokesman stated that the IDF/AF did not plan to purchase the MiG-29. Instead, the evaluation aimed to explore upgrade possibilities for Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) and develop anti-Fulcrum tactics. Elbit Electronics, a division of IAI, had previous experience with Soviet/CIS aircraft, having successfully upgraded the MiG-21MF Fishbed-J for Romania (known as the LanceR) and the Antonov An-72P Coaler-C border patrol aircraft. The evaluation aimed to improve Israeli pilots’ ability to counter the MiG-29 in potential conflicts. As a result, the IDF/AF developed new models of helmet-mounted sights, combined with Rafael Python 4 and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles, to give Israeli pilots an advantage in dogfights against Russian fighters.

Israeli experts believed that the MiG-29 was at least as good as, and in some respects better than, the F-15 and F-16 in terms of aerodynamics and performance. They were impressed by its rugged design and low maintenance requirements. However, they noted that the MiG-29’s avionics suite was less capable than that of Western fighters. IAI discussed potential upgrade programs with several MiG-29 operators, including Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine.

Armaments:

Spoiler

1 GSh-30-1 30mm cannon with 150 rounds

6 R-73 AAM

6 R-60 AAM

2 R-27 AAM

(R-73’s, aswell as it’s 6 pylons are shown)

N019(E) radar

OEPS-29(E) IRST

image

image

image

Specifications:

Spoiler

The MiG-29 has a length of 17.32m, a height of 4.73m and a wingspan of 11.36m, where it gets a wing area of 38 square meters. It weights around 11000kg empty, a gross weight of 14900kg and a MTOW of 18000kg (although I think that the 9.12 is a little lighter). It is powered by 2 RD-33 afterburing turbofan engines, giving out 49.4kN dry and 81.6kN wet aka with afterburner.

image

Sources:

Spoiler

Mikoyan MiG-29 (Famous Russian Aircraft) 2007 (1857802314)

The Israeli Air Force

Israel’s Secretive MiG-29 Fulcrum Test Program

Israeli Fulcrums! The saga of IAF’s MiG-29 fighter jets - The Aviation Geek Club

BEMIL »çÁø ÀÚ·á½Ç - À¯¿ë¿øÀÇ ±º»ç¼¼°è

253 Squadron (Israel) - Wikipedia

Thanks a lot for reading! If you have any extra information, then feel free to share them in the replies! As always, have a good day :)

6 Likes

Would really not help the “copy paste tree” allegations

3 Likes

This is not intended for tech tree, at least not in my view. Honestly I’d wish for it not to be tech tree, rather one of the 3 different alternatives. There are a good amout of copy paste premiums, so it would not matter if it goes there

9 Likes

If Sweden can get a squadron T-80U i think this would be a nice addition 1+

5 Likes

Just don’t let the Americans know you’re getting a trialed MiG-29 or they’ll want one too

2 Likes

They actually have one at the National Museum of the USAF, oof.

But my opinion would be, if the MiG-29 is from the Polish AF, does it have to be in the IAF tree?

+1 for it to be added, only if it’s outside the TT standard of a researchable addition.
I would preferably also like to see it without R-27s, as to my knowledge those weren’t tested, however we have photographic proof the R-73 was. Having a MiG-29 9.12A with only R-73s would be a unique addition for me personally, and one I would like to see added to the Israeli tree ingame. Even with its regular loadout however, I wouldn’t mind its addition much at all so long as it’s limited to being a squadron/premium addition (and if would be a waste of an event vehicle really).

3 Likes

Probably a solid event or Battle Pass vehicle.

1 Like

In sort of (mostly negative) in favor of this addition, depending how it will be introduced.

Interesting plane story-wise, but not something i would like to see in the game. I’m against adding tested/evaluated vehicles in general for any nation. The only place i find it “fine” is when that nation has literally zero other alternative for the BR or role the vehicle is supposed to fulfill.

Something like the Mig-29 Sniper is okay in my book, since it’s a tech demonstrator/upgrade program designed by Israel for the Romanian air force (though that would likely not be put in the israeli tech tree).

Neat story, but -1 from me.

4 Likes

I wonder if the Israeli’s modified them to use Western and/or Israeli weapons akin to the MiG-21 2000?

Similar to what happened with the captured MiG-23MLD, they evaluated it for potential modernizations, but no such modernizations took place on these aircraft in particular. They were mainly looking into how the aircraft could be modernized should anyone wish to modernize their fleets, but no such attempt or desire by a foreign country has occurred (yet).

2 Likes

I would have loved to see it as well, but yeah unfortunately with the arrival of the Romanian OSA in the Italian Ground TT, it’s pretty much confirmed where future Romanian vehicles will be going. Same goes for the LanceR as well I guess, but at least we have the MiG-21-2000 to fill that niche.

HARD NO. There is too much cloned junk been added already. Export vehicles that have no specific modifications for the nation that bought it are enough. Adding stuff that was simply evaluated and never adopted is taking it WAY too far.
This should be a camo skin at best.

3 Likes

I agree with you on that, yet from all the tested MiGs that Israel had, I’d feel comfortable just with the MiG-21 “007”, it was at least battle ready during the six day war, adapted to carry Shafrir 2

1 Like

Yeah if it’s vehicles they ACTUALLY had in service, i’m all for it. It’s not a complete copy/paste either with it’s Shafrir compatability

It would make an awesome squadron vehicle, specially considering the fact that there is currently no squadron aircraft in Israeli tech tree.
But its addition aside, it really makes me sad that Luftwaffe chose the F-4F over MiG-29G for an upgrade to be able to carry AIM-120 missiles :(
MiG-29 with AIM-120 would have been a beautiful thing to happen but Luftwaffe had to ruin it nevertheless.

4 Likes