Very true, though it would at least stop-gap a bit better. Though I doubt we will see a TT Strikemaster, maybe a TT jet provost.
I will ofc always advocate for South African air support to be added.
Very true, though it would at least stop-gap a bit better. Though I doubt we will see a TT Strikemaster, maybe a TT jet provost.
I will ofc always advocate for South African air support to be added.
No. The trend is more missing a ground sub-tree over air.
Oh I guess you could say India is missing air but it’s also missing a proper ground, which is the same with Romania which is also missing both.
BeNeLux, Swiss, Malaysia and Indonesia are missing ground
Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, what they do have is partial. (You could also argue Swiss but that because Germany has no room)
Oh Norway is also like India and Romania(and with what I hear Romania is if not a sub-tree, Denmark can be argued as well.) where they have a home but have as many additions as a homeless nation (sometimes less even).
Brother you got Leopard 2s wdym ;)
A provost is a provost.
just as a hawk is a hawk

thats the predecessor to lancaster. all they really did was replace the two vultures for four merlins, as well as getting rid of the middle tailfin. more like the percival provost before jet provost/strikemaster
but far more different than taping a gun to a provost.
thats more of a spitfire mk1 - mk24 ordeal
B50 is just a beefed up B29. also both were called the Superfortress.
410 is a redesign of 210. Strikemaster is taping a gun to a provost.
Strikemaster is literally just an armed version of the jet powered evolution of the percival provost.
I dont see why youre getting so up tight on it, because that is literally what it is. at most you can say its like a mark difference. MK1a to mk2 spitfire kind of deal
wouldnt fix the issue.
Provost was lost to a BP and is unobtainable now.
a SA MB326 in the tech tree would mean we get a low tier jet trainer turned striker to be used instead of trying our best with fighters that cant carry enough good ground armaments.
How in the fudge we don’t have tech tree versions of these I’ll never know.
I don’t even think the A-6 is on sale anymore!
Pretty simple really.
If you want to play [insert your choice of P2P vehicle here] you have to spend money on acquiring it, if there was a free option, you may not. A-6 which isnt on sale anymore means that you are forced to buy it if/when it becomes available, probably at full price and not during one of the annual sales.
Its just a money making scheme
Calling that a ground sub-tree makes Thailand ground and Hungarian air when first added look like a complete sub-tree.
When there is a full list of WW2 era and cold war stuff the could come.
I guess that technically makes the BeNeLux ground tree more like India and the the like if we are arguing that’s the ground sub-tree.
It reminds me of the Chinese F5A’s joke; however, MB326 was not made in the US, so we might need to wait at least 1 year
Gaijin never cares about that, look at all the sub-trees, they would to C&P all of high tier jets, like Japan, Italy, Germany, and France. How many MIG29s/F5 do we have now?
thats why it should never be added, lol.
Correction, gaijin does care about that but only for specific vehicles/nations. Look how long it took to get the Ram tank for the UK for example, how they refuse to give the UK an M22 when the UK are the only country that actually used it… (same for the T18 boarhound according to some accounts). The Grant/Lee/Sherman side too lol.
People throw hissy fits everytime they talk about adding vehicles that should have been added years ago because “if you want to play X vehicle then go grind X nation!” and the snail tries not to get those people angry.
It is weird that they accepted Gaijin to add tons of Mig29s, F18s, F-16s XD