I get 1-shot by darts all they time. The t-72 had bad aim or rng.
1 Like
Not saying it didnt happen, but it is not the rule. Darts can oneshot the T58 easily.
1 Like
Nobody is surprised that same people that cried about 341 now defend T58
Face it people ,all of you that cry about balance are same ones that abuse all premiums Gaijin placed on BR’s that 2 or even 3 br’s where they belong .You talk and cry about balance but all of you would quit if Gaijin ever got serious about balance .
So yes you’re making up terms, and yes you spent a lot of money to win and are now shilling to keep it’s BR unfairly low.
1 Like
40 USD isn’t alot of monies to me, I like da tank.
2 Likes
50 bucks isn’t a lot of money it’s what a dlc costed and it came with gold and premium time also I didn’t buy it to win I bought because it the mother fcking T58 I been waiting years years even when I play wot for it to come
2 Likes
Right, didn’t this thing in theory be able to pen 16 inches of armor? lol, thats heccing cool.
1 Like
I don’t know to be honest but sometimes I use this link to check stuff out
Good thing it’s model correctly too
1 Like
Funny thing, i’ve never cried about any tank. If T58 was unkillable it would need a nerf. could it be 8.7? sure, but it shouldnt be 9 or 10
Calm yourself down.
3 Likes
Right, didn’t this thing in theory be able to pen 16 inches of armor? lol, thats heccing cool.
The T30 heavy tank which uses the same compatible 155mm ammunition as the T58 was once tested in Aberdeen to fire an unknown “Fin Missile”/ Rocket-assisted APFSDS round. (Yes, I’m serious).
3 Likes
That would be interesting, essentially turning the T30 into a object 120, with less pen (?) and way longer reload ofc.
They are not rocket-assisted and unfortunately… there is no information about the short rod or the long rod, e.g. penetrator dimensions, weight, muzzle velocity, etc.
BRL developed long and short rod APFSDS and HEATFS as early as 1950. They were based on data collected on kinetic energy projectiles researched by Germany late in the war. The asset utilized for testing these new types of ammunition was a T30 Heavy at the BRL facility in Aberdeen pic.twitter.com/e0NS3ux6Ni
— SelvariaBles (@bles_selvaria) February 12, 2025
They’re both quite good, but the T58s shells have so much HE mass, and 1 tap capability it’s better imo, and in my stats.
My kd is vastly higher in the T58, and so is my wr, making me firmly believe it’s far better.
This comment is so off kilter…
It needs a 5.0 sec reload and to be 8.7
It needs no downtiers, it’s already super annoying as is, and extremely powerful.
Also, people have already needed to aim thanks to the M60s
An 8.0 sec reload for an 8.3 tank would be perfectly fine, but given the document it was proven to fire at 2.6 secs, so a nerf like that isn’t possible. The best course of action is to raise it to 9.0 br, and see how it preforms from there.
Um… T14, M4A3E2, T29, T34, T30, T26E1, T26E5, T32E1, T58???
Did you forget all these great heavy tanks???
God forbid Russian heavies get to do anything, they get nerfed to the grave, but USA & German ones get to stay dominating.
Obj. Is now balanced, and the IS-7 is crap.
Oh the thing the Brit’s always complain shatters? Sure, definitely!
1 Like
It’s downsides are:
Slow reversing
And no stab, but you have an oscillating turret which is very well stabilized.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but each of these tanks costs 50$.
1 Like