You nor I know the extent to which any stealth jets are covered by RAM. I argue that atleast 90% of either F35 or F22 are covered by RAM. Everything except the canopy, and the exhausts.
The canopies however have ITO to help with stealth. I dont know if Russia or China employ ITO. I assume they do
I can’t remember where I read but there was a document that said that the RAM was mostly used on the wing edges and intake and Im just saing basically at the points that you know the radar can bounce off
RAM is needed everywhere you can place it to improve stealth. Its on wingtips, inlets, the radome and everything else too to improve front aspect stealth. But you need it everywhere else too to maintain side, bottom, top and stern aspect stealth.
So why are Typhoons currently in the process of being upgraded with them
British Typhoons are yet to receive them and we are talking about the present day, not the future nor the past.
Everything I know is that meteor is equal or maybe even superior to the R-37M
Range wise hell no but intelligence wise it’s superior without a doubt, you’ll still end up eating a R-37M outside the engagement range for the Meteor.
Last I heard there was about a dozen of them, but there wasnt really any pilots to actually fly any of them. Which is one of the major reasons why the Su-57 hasnt been sent anywhere near a certain neighbouring country
I quite literally made fun of that, Russian production of modern vehicles have been absolute cheeks but I’m mainly referring to in-service Typhoons against in-service SU-57s.
In a actual war there wouldn’t be enough SU-57s to counter Typhoons in general but we aren’t talking about that and I’d lean on the side of the Typhoons in that scenario.
On a individual level however the SU-57 is superior factually speaking
I could be wrong, but I think i’ve heard somewhere that they have some maintenance issues and about half of them are usually out-of-service at any given moment in time. I think that is the “dozen” figure i’ve heard previously is from.
Bro you’re comparing an aircraft that was in production for 10 years and the aircraft that just got into production like 3 years ago. And of course that su-57 would be in low numbers because Russia doesn’t have that budget to produce like America can
The Su-57 definitely was designed to be a stealth aircraft, with the PAK-FA program prioritizing ESR-reducing geometry right off the bat.
The Su-27 replacement isn’t the Su-57 either… It’s effectively an equivalent / upgrade but not a direct replacement. If you want possible replacements, the Su-35S has the possibility of better derivatives while the Su-30SM does everything better.