thanks, they really should implement it though, could be very useful
Yeah, if given the choice, no Brit Main would have agreed to the CR3TD. Full CR3 when its actually been fully revealed. Sure. But given all the problems the CR2s have. Throwing an intentionally weak tank into the TT fixes nothing
2 Likes
Yeah, it would. Especially if they never fix the CR2s ready rack. We also have the longest ready replenishment at 20 seconds per round. Being able to force it when it was convenient would be really handy
2 Likes
its because its multi piece right?
My thoughts exactly
1 Like
What is this stealth aircraft discussion? I thought we are in a tank thread.
back on topic now
God knows. My theory is its max rounds divided by a set time. So both the CR2 and the Abrams for example would replenish from 0 to full in the same amount of time, but because we have 4 rounds, each round takes WAY longer. But I have no idea what the replenishment time is on other tanks. So I have no way of knowing if that is the case or not.
But, It could also just be a hold-over mitigation from when we had one of the fastest reloads in game.
A: “yes, you have the fastest rate of fire, but only in short bursts”
Them loaders didn’t skip arm or leg days lol
but it is a multi piece, so even if they did it realistic it would take longer no matter what unfortunately
True, but instead of being 4 rounds, it could be 24-28 instead. So basically, like the Abrams and many other tanks. First stage replenishment is rarely a problem they have to worry about. Meanwhile CR1s and CR2s have to deal with it all the time
2 Likes
You can’t say, we won’t know. Then also equate it as being the very least equal.
That’s just an opinion you hold, because in the face of no real knowledge about either, you are hand waiving off one to say the other is this way.
You want it to be, no real opinion can be formed because we simply don’t know.
It’s simply a selective bias.
i think this is backed up by proof right? if so it sounds fair to have slower replenishment times but bigger first stage ammo
So saying the F-35 has the best radar because its American is what then?
it kinda doesnt though? APG-82v1 far larger, newer, and presumably more advanced so thats probably the best radar
CR1
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m22cZZxaNPXJ
CR2
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ojFgCJ6Jnos4
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nzUoCC2yxJx5
I’d have no issue with 20 second per round replenishment if I spent 99% of the match in first stage. Heck. I rarely take more than 20 rounds these days anyway.
this + DU spall + on demand replenish would make abrams vs chally 2 more balanced, both would get firepower buff, chally gets bigger ready rack for continious fire, but abrams can replenish it quicker so its better suited for the close quarters in parts of WT maps
In contrast, my post suggests that the developers are monstrously biased against British military equipment, largely due to their insecurities about Russian equipment.
2 Likes
Yeah. The ready rack is the big buff Im pushing for. Also would be good to get dozer blades added to the CR2s. All could be fitted with them. (the base CR2 was on the dev server and still in files, heck still has the mountings modeled in game)
That would be fun for the hull-down gameplay that the CR2 favours. Do some polishing to the Mantlet and we’d be golden.
Then yeah, better DU modeling, perhaps with the ERA perforation tips and the CR2 might actually be taken at top tier again. The optimal strat at the moment is to run light tanks and scout your way into CAS
2 Likes
I never said that did I?
But you saying it’s not without having any actual evidence, is what?
Neither of you can offer anything on it for exactly the reason you stated, we simply don’t and won’t know for some time. So hand waiving it off and putting the other as good is a nothing burger.