Is teamkilling AI attackers logically beneficial for winning?

[Creastroy]

Continuing the discussion from What even is "passive behavior":

@Necronomica

Bombing bases does lower the enemies tickets so it does contribute to the team and towards the goal of winning the match. Is it the “optimal” way to bleed tickets? No. Is there a rule that says players have to play the “optimal” way? Also no.

As long as they are still contributing towards the goal of winning the match and are still actively playing it isn’t passive behaviour.

Everyone is allowed to play the way they find fun as long as it doesn’t actively disrupt teammates gameplay or doesn’t at all contribute towards winning the match.

So, let’s take a look at AI attackers by the logic

• They kill ground AI
• They don’t bleed tickets by killing ground AI
• Players bleed tickets by killing ground AI

So AI attackers reduces the possible tickets to be ground pounded by players.

In addition the difference in max ground pound bleed is needed for each base destroyed reduces 200 tickets. Not everyone can bomb, not every game is at top tier.

So teamkilling them can be beneficial in ticket bleeding the enemy team. Q.E.D.