Is it really SEP V2 or SEP V3?

IMG_6058
IMG_6057

A lot of people have been saying “It’s the SEP V2, not V3”. But I believe otherwise, since in the photos above, there are several differences between the in game V2 and the trailer Abrams. My main point it IS the V3 is how in the trailer, the Abrams has only 12 smokes grenades. In game however, the V2 has its new smoke system which has more than 12. I doubt Gaijin would remove the newly added smoke system. Just speculation though in the end.

1 Like

M1A2 SEPv3 turret face:

M1A2 SEPv2 turret face:

image

Teaser M1A2 turret face:

image

15 Likes

Just wait for devstream

1 Like


source: https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2020/army/2020abrams-m1a2.pdf?ver=8YvBd9qRklJDXHFaAtPGKA%253D%253D

2 Likes

Less than 24 hours

where’s the fun in that lol

It is more than likely a V2, but with the new CROWS turret I am hoping that means a model rework.

Spoiler

Yes I am ready to be disappointed.

It really needs to replace the .50, with the Mk.19.

hopefully they go with the M230 on M1A3

Wouldn’t mind having a mod to do that. But the .50 isn’t bad it helps with aircraft and light vehicles.

mk 19 should be a lot better against vehicles but worse against aircraft

if they gave it M230 it should be a lot better against both than the 0.50

agreed bu t don’t see the .50 slouching. I just hoping it mean they look more at the turret ring.

I’m not sure that the LF would get access to it’s HE-VT (all are based off M798 on the AH-64 so have ~51mm (probably an undercount)), the HV HEDP M430A1 pens ~3" (~76 mm) and has access to the M1001 HVCC as well.

I get that, but I feel like its still too low of velocity to reliably hit aircraft or helicopters, where the LF gets a higher velocity and should have lower dispersion

even without the proxy rounds it would be an upgrade over a 0.50 but with the proxy it would be very good