this is literally what he does all day, responding to him is a waste of time, let alone trying to make sense of his posts
2 Likes
Can you stop that, you create the worst strawmans. I really am curious if you’re able to respond without strawman’ing whoever you’re talking to.
So much more could be said that doesn’t need to resort to “glad you agree with me that(insert, unrelated non related statement here)” or “are you saying (insert unrelated untrue summarization of their statement here).”
I’ve seen you argue in good faith often, so I’m not sure why the other 50% of your takes are just horrendous strawmans.
2 Likes
@Caernarvon02 @ExcaliburSniper @AlvisWisla Hash it out in the sub topic if yall’d be so kind. Don’t need to go through 50 replies of you guys bashing each other.
eh nvm.
no he didnt
Dude, the screenshot is right there.
“They [Gaijin] made Steam label…” “…I don’t call that listening to the playerbase.”
Unless he’s claiming Valve produces War Thunder… last I checked Valve is not War Thunder’s publisher either. [War Thunder would have more microtransactions if owned by Valve.]
It is well known that only Valve has control over the “off topic” reviews label. All you need to do is ask any indie dev and they’ll tell you this.
Devs don’t have control over this.
They are claiming that Gaijin did that.
Correct them and say that valve did it instead, instead of making them say something they didn’t.
3 Likes
The Bosvark is really good though
1 Like
IDK, it’s common knowledge among Steam users that Valve is the only one with control.
That with Excalibur’s posts being antagonistic toward players and companies in the past.
He decided to taint my mind about him by DMing me with xenophobic hate against America the other week [not on the forum but elsewhere].
So pardon me if I assess that he should know about what he’s talking about before he talks about it; if you want me to assume ignorance more often I will. I’ll have to calm down first of course, but I will.
It turns like a pregnant cow and can be taken out not even .50 cals, but simple .303 coax mgs.
Which “not a big deal, you stay in the rear.” And yeah, it works at WW2 BRs.
However, take it to 7.7 and you see wiesels and marders and goodness knows what else zipping around the battlefield and tear you apart before you get into a proper position.
Also, big blindspot in the front that you can counter by facehugging a rock, but your turning radius makes leaving that spot quite difficult.
Meanwhile, aforementioned wiesel is impervious to my Cent mk3’s coaxial even side-on.
2 Likes
True, but that thing shreds aircraft, and it’s effective range is ridiculous.
7.7 I use the Attacker jet.
7.7 USA I use F-84G.
7.7 USSR I use La-200/Su-11.
More consistent vehicles than me learning how to use the SPAA better.
Clearly not everyone knows it.
Still, accusing others of something they didn’t 100% say is bad, and you shouldn’t do it.
I have 7.7 U.S aircraft.
I don’t have 7.7 British aircraft.
And plane RP doesnt go to tanks.
I’ve reframed the post to mean the same thing I wanted it to mean while putting information in the first sentence:
And let’s not forget the ‘’‘’‘’‘pre-moderation’‘’‘’‘’ of comments on the news page, which filters out the majority of critical comments. I don’t call that listening to the player base either.
That does make sense, having a relatively official news page with moderation isn’t a bad thing.
Plus, the forums exist and they have no pre moderation.
2 Likes
can never get it to work better than the ystervark. and I only really use that as a low tier fox to base rush because it can struggle