The BR-367 has more flat penetration at the cost of half the explosive filler (77g vs 150g). BR-365 seems to have better 60° pen at 500m or more. BR-367 still has better penetration at 30°. Which is the better round? Does the extra pen make up for lost explosive filler? I feel the BR-365 gets a lot more oneshots compared to the M62 which has similar amount of explosive filler as BR-367 (63.7g).
Which round should I take on the T34-85-STP and T44? Does it even matter?
BR-367:
BR-365:
Both. 365 normally loaded though. You will encounter enough tanks where you need the flat pen, but the ability to pen at 70+ degree angles and one shot is why the T34-85 has remained at such a high br
BR-367 is a side-graded to the BR-365 in my opinion.
Use BR-367 for flat armour (such as the Panther F’s turret cheeks / slightly angled Tiger I’s hull armour), use BR-365 for everything else.
Keep in mind that even at 10m, you can extrapolate from the 0, 30, and 60 degrees and it tells you that BR-365 will have better angle performance >60 degrees than BR-367, which is quite a lot more since both rounds don’t reliably ricochet until more than ~70 degrees.
BR-365 better Post Pen damage will one shot mostly anything it pens.
I think the only real reason to carry the APCBC is to be able to pen some US tanks turrets like the T29/30/34 and Jumbo, which have around 142mm turret side armor.
Other than that there’s basically no point for the higher flat pen.