Censorship as it seems… Hide it so the people forget.
6 Likes
It seems that the administrator intentionally hid it or simply deleted it
10 Likes
even after we got permession to use the report
1 Like
@Dontkev-psn
Hey i think i might just have found something if it hasn’t already been found.
For this one, in this video: (https://youtu.be/GBDmnKd8mBI?si=_FzfkGWoD5HxNNiH) at 2:17 you can see a list of information, center screen to the right, it lists “Slant range” . I don’t know if that helps in any way but i hope it does :)
Edit:
Thx @IronPuma for the vid link ^^
10 Likes
do we know anything about what they are doing with the missing range rport btw?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/NbRv9CEI6Eb8
like, they are not just ignoring it right?
2 Likes
No idea, i sadly have zero insight into development and bug-report handling.
1 Like
Very good spotting :))))
<3
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Hehe they run Windows on these systems :D
And if I’m not mistaken that screen only shows radar data? 18 km range, 965 m altitude and a speed of 166 m/s? Might be wrong or it’s a speed range. Can’t read the latter number.
That is what i could make out it:
and the that the target is apparently moving away from the radar, judging by the second section below.
Type: Track
Track Label: 10
Slant Range: 18.663 km
Bearing: 305.191 °
Elevation: 2.970 °
Speed: 166.714 m/s
Course: 180.120°
Sadly doesn’t look like its of much use to us. :/
A Time to target or similar would’ve been very useful in that case.
1 Like
Yeah I don’t think Diehl would leave any bread crumbs for us :(
The “slant range” could perhaps be in terms of minimum lock/engagement distances for the radar as devs have previously asked if it’s ground distance or slant range.
1 Like
This whole thing seems like its about to get its own “Let’s discuss the Abram’s Armor/Western MANPADs” Dev post here soon.
"We’ve heard your frustration and here’s what we intend do to:
Almost nothing. Here’s a small token improvement that does almost nothing to address your concerns. Our hidden sources say we are right and we will continue to monitor performance (not really) in the event further changes are needed at a later time (expect one official nerf and about three stealth nerfs)."
6 Likes
Fair enough, i completely forgot about the fact that this thing also has a radar with its own problems…
the moment they decided to have the missile mach 2 acording to (source: dude trust me)
this thing was doomed from the start, there is NOTHING anywhere indicating mach 2 for it yet they just decided thats what it is
the fact that we even have to try so hard to prove them wrong is insane, i have NO idea how they will fix the range on it, like what "oh yeh it can engage a target 40km out if its flying towards the launcher at mach3, → not a bug, working as intended)
4 Likes
Yes my point is exactly that, effective means it can carry out its mission. Maximum would probably be what you described haha
1 Like
Really ashamed of the devs here, like this is fucking embarrassing man. We’re really gonna blackhole sources because we don’t wanna change the missile speed and make it good? On the off chance it’s somehow classified, we already know well enough that this missile should be Mach 3 capable and there’s plenty of sources to back it up, there’s just no excuse
8 Likes
ngl only reason i used to play this game was realism. now that it gone i dont see any reason to play it
4 Likes
The realism was never really a thing anyway
4 Likes