???
Zusammenfassung
Yes, its an sentence
I swear if that’s the same person denying all the reports, they need to seriously rethink their influence.
What’s the absolute worst is the closing of the report instantly without giving anyone a chance to comment on this bs.
I mean they are constantly moving the goal post and yet again we already provided primary sources for range and time to target, so these secondary sources SHOULD be eligible to be used to get the speed value to ADD to the primary reports…
How is it not supplementing the primary reports? They all support the manufacturers claim and paint a more accurate picture. Why are they purposefully ignoring info and randomly selecting numbers that make no sense?!
@Gunjob Sorry for pinging you, I just have the feeling we might need someone with fresh eyes over here. There is a lot of seemingly unjust action going around and maybe you could shed some more led on the situation.
I have never heard of secondary sources to be required to be from the country of origin. Has that ever been the rule?
14 Likes
Dev Server got .33, nothing changed for the SLM in it
but this was added with is likely to be used one day on the SLM
All reports that got rejected cuz of some unwritten rule, latest being secondary source is not from the country of origin??? Sweden is known for testing weapon systems in-depth and providing more than decent documentation from their testing.
12 Likes
I think for it to count fully those sources also needs to be in the report. So you can’t really send “new” sources on their own hoping that they get added to the old ones, you have to provide all the sources in one cohesive report with explanations of what the sources are, what they say and what category they are. You can’t just post a list of links with no further information and hope that everything is understood, especially when it’s in other languages.
That answer is still a bit odd though, i can’t personally remember there being a requirement of country of origin in that way before. I do know there are requirements when it comes to RU sources on Western equipment as well as the other way around, but EU-EU sources i haven’t seen being a thing before.
3 Likes
I can’t believe they didn’t accept any of it for such stupid reason, they nerf the g overload based on what is clearly foreign sources according to this guy but deny all 4 sources for Mach 3 what a joke they are just twisting the requirements to always ask for something that doesn’t exist for the Slm
11 Likes
So what’s the “linked to the internal report” for?
Adding the same sources always ended up in “duplicate” now.
I mean if you think that might be the issue than I will make another report with all the sources combined, but I have a feeling it’s just getting the duplicate and magazine treatment…
This is what frustrates me the most, reports that decrease performance can be 3rd party but anything proving the missile to be capable of reaching mach 3 must be from diehl themselves
9 Likes
gunjob is typing :))))))
7 Likes
I kind of regret pulling him in here lol hope he just turns other way and runs xD
Not a requirement I’ve ever forced on players, provided its an operating country I would consider that perfectly acceptable as a source. I can’t do anything about the report right now as I’m working and stuck in some training session. But this evening I’ll take a look.
31 Likes
Thank you :)
could you by chance also look at this one?
like, I dont get what the Mod there is even trying to prove
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7QLtjHf43Zin
So when it comes to buffing, they need thousands of sources, but as soon as something needs to be nerfed, they just trust a random report with 0 sources??
9 Likes
What? You say the radar doesn’t track nearer than 500 Meters, he shows a target 580 Meters away and says it does. Seriously, has this manager potatoes for brains?
1 Like
Source was attached, any attachments are only viewable by BRM’s and the user who created the report.
actuel devs
2 Likes
From what i see he doesn’t understand you are talking about the altitude and not distance, luckly the comments are closed and you can’t further explain the issue ))
Source is hidden and only visible to moderators. But it’s definitely not a primary source from Diehl but rather a secondary source, so why a single one was enough I don’t understand… It was also likely a “foreign” source as well…
7 Likes
Probly atached pdf, but according to our post that just got denied as not enough info, so should that post have been denied as it’s a foreign source aswell, double standards man
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.