Dev Server got .33, nothing changed for the SLM in it
but this was added with is likely to be used one day on the SLM
All reports that got rejected cuz of some unwritten rule, latest being secondary source is not from the country of origin??? Sweden is known for testing weapon systems in-depth and providing more than decent documentation from their testing.
I think for it to count fully those sources also needs to be in the report. So you can’t really send “new” sources on their own hoping that they get added to the old ones, you have to provide all the sources in one cohesive report with explanations of what the sources are, what they say and what category they are. You can’t just post a list of links with no further information and hope that everything is understood, especially when it’s in other languages.
That answer is still a bit odd though, i can’t personally remember there being a requirement of country of origin in that way before. I do know there are requirements when it comes to RU sources on Western equipment as well as the other way around, but EU-EU sources i haven’t seen being a thing before.
I can’t believe they didn’t accept any of it for such stupid reason, they nerf the g overload based on what is clearly foreign sources according to this guy but deny all 4 sources for Mach 3 what a joke they are just twisting the requirements to always ask for something that doesn’t exist for the Slm
So what’s the “linked to the internal report” for?
Adding the same sources always ended up in “duplicate” now.
I mean if you think that might be the issue than I will make another report with all the sources combined, but I have a feeling it’s just getting the duplicate and magazine treatment…
This is what frustrates me the most, reports that decrease performance can be 3rd party but anything proving the missile to be capable of reaching mach 3 must be from diehl themselves
gunjob is typing :))))))
I kind of regret pulling him in here lol hope he just turns other way and runs xD
Not a requirement I’ve ever forced on players, provided its an operating country I would consider that perfectly acceptable as a source. I can’t do anything about the report right now as I’m working and stuck in some training session. But this evening I’ll take a look.
Thank you :)
could you by chance also look at this one?
like, I dont get what the Mod there is even trying to prove
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7QLtjHf43Zin
So when it comes to buffing, they need thousands of sources, but as soon as something needs to be nerfed, they just trust a random report with 0 sources??
What? You say the radar doesn’t track nearer than 500 Meters, he shows a target 580 Meters away and says it does. Seriously, has this manager potatoes for brains?
Source was attached, any attachments are only viewable by BRM’s and the user who created the report.
actuel devs
From what i see he doesn’t understand you are talking about the altitude and not distance, luckly the comments are closed and you can’t further explain the issue ))
Source is hidden and only visible to moderators. But it’s definitely not a primary source from Diehl but rather a secondary source, so why a single one was enough I don’t understand… It was also likely a “foreign” source as well…
Probly atached pdf, but according to our post that just got denied as not enough info, so should that post have been denied as it’s a foreign source aswell, double standards man
That is however a primary source, so yes, only one needed.
For the SLM speed we only have third party (not accepted at all unless the other requirements are met by other sources as well) or Secondary sources (at least two needed).
We should be up to two secondary now, but we’ll see what Gunjob says when he’s had time to look into it :)
quick question in the wiki page of the aim9x it says at least 60g but in dev serv only 50g ?
“Not reliable source, get gud” bug report in their words