Iris-t slm

Link to said report?

I don’t have it, will have to look, but you can see mine issue on the video attached, target deploys it’s ordnance 15km away, and it is instantly switched, even when the seeker is still not show as active on the radar screen.

Is it still not the case that even if the main issue is that the radar itself is switching target, reducing the seeker activation range to 4km still solves this issue? The fired ordnance would have been past the SLM’s missile at the time of seeker activation.

No, as when the target is switched, it changes the 4km zone too. It switches the tracked target to a for example bomb, and it switches the seeker activation range to bomb position, the plane can do 180 and the missile will not care, it will act like it was always aimed at a bomb.

I hope this graphic makes it clear (edited for the current range)
image
image

1 Like

hey mythicpi any news on this bug

The guidance type phase that changes targeting from plane to ordinance is not IR, its the DL phase. By reducing the range at which IR was activated they are prolonging the DL phase during which the guidance can be broken by dropping a SDB/500lbs/etc. bomb, firing off FFARs/Zunis/etc. or firing off any type of a missile.

Effectively this is a nerf by making the currently existing bug with DataLink (on more than just the SLM) switch over more often and easier by extending the time the missile is in this bugged DL phase. Previously with 10km as soon as the seeker went IR it wouldnt be affected by this “spoofing” and planes like Su30s couldnt break the lock anymore by firing off 7 trillion missiles.
Additionally because SLM has only got 4 DL channels, by getting a missile to lock on the plane sooner meant your able to divert your attention to other targets as that one was already autonomous.

If they had actually atleast fixed the problem thats in DL phase then the reduction in IR range would have been less of an issue.
This is basically gaijin stealing your cake and eating it too, while youre stuck there, cakeless and about to explode

Im pretty sure they “balance” vehicles on vehicles stats and not on nation winrate.

Maybe because no new prem Su30 free meals? We know who have the most wallet warrior lane up at those BR right? Right?

We do it’s literally from Saab yet gaijin still to this day ignore it as a source


https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1eDgYYGXq3h9

image

Btw that report doesnt have the comment section locked.
For anyone wanting to voice their opinion

To quote gajin.
The Mach 3 are only reached if shoot from a plane at mach 1 mimimi

abwcha

It Is What It Is GIFs | Tenor

I am yet to test it, maybe they did, somehow.

im going into custom with Armen rn to test it, but given that they only talked about IR reduction and said nothing about DL (and that DL affects other systems as well not just SLM) i doubt it. Ill let you know

Man, i feel like you woke up with a head of your favorite horse in your hands

Spoiler

Ain’t you bugreporting without respect.

What?

Your bugreport and a godfather reference.